PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall57/ 100Good
Manduka Women's Essence Legging

Manduka · Activewear

Manduka Women's Essence Legging

Good

Lower concern, typical performance legging with no known PFAS treatment.

Verdict · SkipNylon blend legging with no known hazardous coatings, dyes, or flame retardants; lower PFAS concern and no brand safety flags on record.

Manduka's Essence Legging is a nylon-blend athletic legging with no disclosed water-repellent or stain-resistant finish. No public PFAS claims or third-party testing found; standard nylon apparel carries lower PFAS risk than water-repellent coating-treated items.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nylon blend, likely uncoated or minimally treated

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Manduka Women's Essence Legging is made of, ingredients and materials

The Manduka Essence Legging is a nylon blend, likely polyamide (nylon 6 or nylon 66) mixed with elastane or spandex for stretch. Nylon itself is a synthetic polymer with no inherent leaching risk at body temperature. The blend is uncoated or minimally treated based on available product descriptions, meaning no water-repellent or stain-resistant chemical finishes are advertised or typical for this product class, reducing exposure to hazardous topical treatments.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes and colorant allergens

Nylon is commonly dyed with azo dyes during manufacturing. No specific dye restrictions or testing are documented for this product. Individuals with sensitive skin or documented dye allergies should check for irritation in first few wears; washing before first use is standard practice.

70/ 100
⏳

Elastane (spandex) degradation and skin contact

Elastane/spandex fibers can degrade with chlorine exposure, high heat, and UV light, which may theoretically increase fiber shedding. Wash in cool water and avoid prolonged sun drying to minimize degradation; no acute toxicity from elastane is documented.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Formaldehyde resins (wrinkle resistance, durability) are not typically applied to stretch leggings unless explicitly marketed as wrinkle-free or performance-treated. No formaldehyde finish is advertised for this product; this is not a standard hazard in uncoated nylon blends of this type.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Antimony in polyester

Antimony is a catalyst used in polyester (PET) production, not nylon. This product is nylon-based, so antimony exposure from the fiber itself is not a relevant concern.

95/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

No flame-retardant treatment is advertised or typical for casual performance leggings unless specifically marketed for outdoor or safety use. This product does not carry such claims; no flame retardant hazard is on record.

Source, EPA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Manduka is a yoga and activewear brand with a public focus on sustainability and transparency, though formal third-party certifications (GOTS, OEKO-TEX) are not consistently documented across their full line. The brand does not publicly disclose specific chemical management practices or azo dye restrictions in product literature reviewed. No recalls, health complaints, or documented safety controversies specific to this legging are on record.

How it compares in its category

Performance leggings in nylon blends are standard across the activewear category. This product occupies the mid-market segment; it avoids the additional hazard layers present in lower-cost imported leggings (often heavier chemical finishing) and does not claim premium eco-certifications that higher-end alternatives do. The lack of waterproofing or flame-resistant treatment is typical and actually reduces chemical exposure compared to technical or outdoor leggings.

If you buy it

Wash in cool to warm water with mild detergent; avoid bleach and fabric softeners, which can degrade elastane and stress the nylon fibers over time. Dry on low heat or air dry to preserve elasticity and avoid unnecessary thermal stress. Replace when seams begin to fray, elastic loses recovery, or fabric pills severely; typical lifespan is 1-2 years with regular use. No special precautions are needed for skin contact or storage.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Manduka has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More activewear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.