PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Marmot Urban Hauler

Marmot · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

Marmot Urban Hauler

Bad

High risk. Urban daypack with water-repellent coating treatment undisclosed.

Verdict · SkipPolyester daypack with unconfirmed water-repellent coating chemistry; no brand transparency on hazard disclosures, but material class risks are low-to-moderate if maintained properly.

Marmot's Urban Hauler uses durable polyester with water-repellent coating. The brand does not publicly disclose PFAS content or whether they use PFAS-free alternatives.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester shell with water-repellent coating treatment

Lab data

No public lab test

What Marmot Urban Hauler is made of, ingredients and materials

The Urban Hauler shell is polyester with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the surface. water-repellent coating coatings historically used PFAS compounds, though many brands have shifted to PFAS-free alternatives in recent years; Marmot has not publicly disclosed which formulation they use on this model. Polyester itself is a stable synthetic polymer with low inherent toxicity, but degradation and off-gassing risk depends on dyes, finishes, and storage conditions.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Water-repellent coating finish chemistry is unconfirmed by brand. If PFAS-based, wear and laundering could release compounds over time; non-PFAS alternatives exist but are not documented here.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
💨

VOC off-gassing from synthetic coating and dyes

New polyester gear with water-repellent coating finish may off-gas volatile organics in the first weeks of use, especially if stored warm or in low-ventilation spaces. Airing the pack outdoors before heavy use can reduce initial exposure.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

Polyester apparel typically uses azo dyes; no recalls or specific concerns documented for Marmot Urban Hauler. Azo dyes are regulated under EU and US restrictions, but used globally. Risk is low if product meets current standards.

95/ 100
✅

Antimony in polyester fiber

Antimony is sometimes used as a catalyst in polyester production and can remain as trace residue. Exposure risk via skin contact from apparel is minimal and not a documented concern for this product class.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Some polyester finishes use formaldehyde-based resins for wrinkle resistance or sizing; Marmot does not disclose finishing chemistry. No reports of formaldehyde off-gassing from Marmot daypacks.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Marmot has not made public commitments regarding PFAS elimination or transparency about water-repellent coating chemistry on specific products. The brand does not publish Material Safety Data Sheets or restricted substance lists for consumer daypack lines. This silence contrasts with competitors (e.g., Patagonia, Arc'teryx) who have begun disclosing or eliminating PFAS from apparel. No major recalls or contamination incidents are documented for Marmot Urban Hauler.

How it compares in its category

Most polyester daypacks in this price tier use water-repellent coating treatments of unknown composition; few brands disclose the chemistry. Premium alternatives (Patagonia, Arc'teryx) increasingly use PFAS-free water repellents or transparent certification. Budget alternatives may use lower-quality coatings that degrade faster. The Urban Hauler sits mid-market without standout transparency, placing it in a crowded category where disclosure gaps are common.

If you buy it

Wash infrequently in cool water with mild detergent to preserve the water-repellent coating and minimize chemical leaching. Avoid dry cleaning (uses aggressive solvents) and high-heat drying. The water-repellent coating finish will degrade over 2-4 years of regular use; reapplication products exist but introduce additional chemical exposure. Store dry in a ventilated space to prevent mold and off-gassing from trapped moisture.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Marmot has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

REI Co-op Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

REI Co-op

Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Polypropylene storage bin, no water-resistant coating mentioned
  • UV degradation and additive leaching

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Marmot Tool Box

Marmot

Tool Box

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified
  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polyester and nylon manufacturing

5 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Patagonia Disperser Roll Top Pack 40L

Patagonia

Disperser Roll Top Pack 40L

45PoorPFAS grade
  • Recycled polyester with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • PFAS

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.