PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall53/ 100Good
Mitchum Antiperspirant Deodorant Men Gel

Mitchum · Deodorant

Mitchum Antiperspirant Deodorant Men Gel

Excellent

Lower concern, but Mitchum remains silent on PFAS status.

Verdict: BuyGel antiperspirant with no established safety red flags; standard cosmetic hazards present at typical low levels; brand transparency modest but product category inherently lower-risk.

Mitchum's gel antiperspirant lacks water-resistant coatings and polymer treatments typically associated with PFAS. Standard gel formulation poses lower PFAS risk than waterproof cosmetics.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Gel base (water, glycerin, polymers); no fluorinated coatings expected

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
🔩

Aluminum in antiperspirant active

Aluminum chlorohydrate is the intended active ingredient at 15-20% typical concentration. Long-term underarm absorption and systemic accumulation have been debated; no causal link to Alzheimer's disease is established by major health bodies (FDA, WHO), but ongoing epidemiological research remains limited. Individual sensitivity varies; some users report localized dermatitis.

45/ 100
🏭

1,4-dioxane as manufacturing byproduct

Gel-based cosmetics using ethoxylated polymers (common in texture stabilizers) may carry trace 1,4-dioxane contamination from synthesis. Mitchum does not publicly commit to testing or removal limits. FDA does not set a maximum level, and presence at trace levels in finished products is generally considered below acute risk, but long-term dermal exposure assessment is incomplete.

70/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components

Mitchum Men products typically include synthetic fragrance blends labeled as 'fragrance' without itemizing constituent chemicals. Common fragrance allergens (limonene, linalool, geraniol) may trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals; no public data on specific allergen concentrations in this product.

70/ 100

Polymer degradation under heat or UV

Acrylate or cellulose-based polymers in the gel can break down if exposed to sustained heat (e.g., hot vehicles, direct sunlight), potentially releasing residual monomers or oligomers with mild irritant properties. Risk is minimized by cool, dark storage and product replacement within normal shelf life.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or published testing data for lead, cadmium, or chromium contamination in Mitchum deodorant products. Cosmetic colorants and preservatives used in gel formulas are regulated under FDA rules, but independent third-party testing of finished products is uncommon at retail price points.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Mitchum Men Gel is a water and glycerin base with polymers (likely acrylates or cellulose derivatives) for texture and adhesion, plus aluminum-based active ingredients (typically aluminum chlorohydrate) as the antiperspirant agent. The gel formulation avoids aerosol propellants and solid wax matrices, reducing thermal degradation and inhalation risk. No ceramic or enamel coatings, glazes, or fluorinated polymers are present in the product itself, keeping the hazard profile narrower than cookware or textiles.

The brand's record and disclosure

Mitchum (Revlon-owned) does not prominently disclose PFAS testing or avoidance commitments, consistent with many mainstream deodorant brands. The brand has no major recalls or documented safety controversies specific to this product line. Ingredient transparency is standard for cosmetics (listed on packaging and online) but does not extend to supply chain heavy metal or 1,4-dioxane testing claims, a gap common across the category.

How it compares in its category

Mitchum Men Gel sits in the mid-market segment alongside brands like Secret and Degree; all use similar aluminum active ingredients and polymer bases. Compared to natural or aluminum-free alternatives (e.g., crystal deodorants, baking-soda formulas), it trades slightly higher aluminum exposure for stronger antiperspirant efficacy. Compared to aerosol sprays, the gel format eliminates inhalation and propellant concerns but retains dermal contact risks from any trace contaminants.

If you buy it

Apply only to clean, dry underarm skin to minimize irritation and aluminum absorption variability. Do not apply to broken or recently shaved skin. Store in a cool, dry location (not heated cars or bathrooms with sustained heat) to prevent polymer breakdown and separation. Replace if the gel separates, hardens, or develops odor, typically within 12-24 months. Discontinue use if rash, itching, or staining develops and consult a dermatologist if persistent.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Mitchum has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.