PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Mitchum Women's Advanced Control Shower Fresh Gel Antiperspirant & Deodorant Twin Pack

Mitchum · Deodorant

Mitchum Women's Advanced Control Shower Fresh Gel Antiperspirant & Deodorant Twin Pack

Excellent

Lower concern for cosmetic gel, but Mitchum provides no PFAS transparency.

Verdict: BuyMitchum gel antiperspirant has no established safety concerns beyond typical deodorant hazards; transparency gap on PFAS does not override low-risk profile.

Mitchum's gel antiperspirant lists no PFAS-typical additives like Teflon-type coating or Teflon-family coating in disclosed formulations. Gels rely on aluminum salts and silicones rather than fluorinated compounds.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

gel antiperspirant/deodorant; hydrocarbon and silicone base

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
🔩

Aluminum salts (systemic absorption from antiperspirant)

Aluminum chlorohydrate is the active ingredient in this antiperspirant. Scientific consensus from FDA and dermatology bodies finds topical antiperspirant aluminum absorption to be minimal at approved concentrations, but cumulative lifetime exposure remains incompletely studied. This product carries typical antiperspirant risk, not elevated.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens (Shower Fresh scent blend)

Mitchum lists 'fragrance' as a single ingredient without component disclosure. Fragrance blends commonly contain limonene, linalool, and other common contact allergens. Approximately 1-3 percent of the population experience fragrance-related dermatitis; unscented alternatives are available if sensitivity is known.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Mitchum's published ingredient lists do not indicate formaldehyde releasers (e.g., DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) are present in this formula. Silicone and hydrocarbon bases are naturally antimicrobial, reducing preservative burden.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Talc contamination

This is a gel formula, not a powder, so talc-related mineral contamination or asbestos risk does not apply. Talc concerns are specific to powder deodorants and body powders.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Gel antiperspirants do not typically include colorants or mineral fillers at meaningful concentrations. No documented recalls or testing results indicate lead, cadmium, or arsenic contamination in Mitchum formulas.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Mitchum's gel antiperspirant uses a hydrocarbon and silicone base typical of modern gel formulations, designed to deliver aluminum chlorohydrate (the active antiperspirant) without the greasiness of older cream forms. Gel matrices reduce irritant contact time compared to stick formulas and are less prone to bacterial colonization during storage. The silicone and hydrocarbon carriers are inert cosmetic standards with minimal skin penetration risk at intended use levels.

The brand's record and disclosure

Mitchum, owned by Revlon, publishes ingredient lists but does not provide detailed safety certifications, third-party testing, or explicit PFAS policy statements. No major recalls or safety controversies specific to Mitchum deodorants are documented in FDA or consumer databases. The brand's silence on PFAS and broader chemical transparency reflects industry norm rather than a red flag, but contrasts with competitors (e.g., Schmidt's) offering fuller ingredient sourcing disclosure.

How it compares in its category

Mitchum's gel antiperspirant occupies the mainstream safety middle: safer than some budget stick brands with higher heavy-metal contamination risk, but less transparent than premium natural or certified alternatives. Aluminum chlorohydrate strength is comparable to competitors like Secret and Degree. Gel formulas in general carry lower dermal irritation profiles than older cream or powder forms.

If you buy it

Apply to dry underarm skin and allow 30 seconds to fully dry before dressing to prevent spotting and maximize efficacy. Store in cool, dry conditions away from direct sunlight to prevent silicone separation. Do not use on broken or irritated skin; if redness or burning occurs, rinse and discontinue. Gel formulas typically last 24 months unopened; replace if separation or odor changes occur.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Mitchum has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.