PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall59/ 100Good
Mitchum Women's Unscented Anti-Perspirant Deodorant Roll-On

Mitchum · Deodorant

Mitchum Women's Unscented Anti-Perspirant Deodorant Roll-On

Excellent

Lower concern for personal care without known PFAS triggers, brand silent.

Verdict: BuyMitchum unscented roll-on is lower-risk within deodorant category; aluminum chlorohydrate is established safe at typical use levels; no major brand controversies or ingredient red flags identified.

Mitchum's unscented roll-on uses aluminum chlorohydrate with no reported Teflon-family coating coatings or waterproofing treatments that would warrant PFAS. The brand makes no PFAS claims or disclosures.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Water-based aluminum chlorohydrate + starch/talc base, roll-on applicator

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
🪨

Talc contamination (if present in base)

Mitchum formulations may include talc as an absorbent filler. Historical talc from mining sites can contain asbestos fibers; modern pharmaceutical-grade talc is processed to remove asbestos, but the FDA does not mandate pre-market certification. Risk is low with typical underarm use (not on lungs), but inhalation during application should be minimized.

70/ 100
⚠️

Skin sensitization and irritation

Aluminum chlorohydrate can trigger mild contact dermatitis or irritation in sensitive individuals, especially on freshly shaved or broken skin. The unscented formulation reduces fragrance allergen risk but does not eliminate potential irritation from the active ingredient or preservatives used in the water-based base.

70/ 100
⚠️

Preservative allergens (typical to water-based formulas)

Water-based deodorants require preservatives to prevent microbial growth; Mitchum typically uses parabens or phenoxyethanol. These are allowed in cosmetics but trigger contact sensitization in a small subset of users. The product label should list preservatives; test on a small area first if you have sensitive skin or a history of cosmetic reactions.

70/ 100
⚠️

Roll-on applicator contamination

Roll-on ball applicators can harbor bacteria if shared or if moisture is trapped in the housing. Ensure the cap seals tightly and do not allow the ball to remain wet. Replace if you notice odor from the applicator itself, which signals microbial colonization.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

Aluminum absorption and systemic accumulation

Aluminum chlorohydrate does not penetrate intact skin significantly; plasma levels from antiperspirant use remain below levels associated with any known toxicity. No established link between topical antiperspirant aluminum and Alzheimer's or other diseases in peer-reviewed epidemiology. FDA considers aluminum in antiperspirants safe at approved concentrations.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Mitchum uses aluminum chlorohydrate as its active antiperspirant agent, a salt form that works by forming plugs in sweat ducts. The formulation includes starch and/or talc as absorbent bases to manage moisture and texture. Being water-based rather than silicone-based means lower volatility and simpler rinsing, though talc specifically carries historical contamination risks (see hazards). The unscented variant avoids fragrance allergens, reducing irritation potential versus scented versions.

The brand's record and disclosure

Mitchum (owned by Revlon) does not publish detailed ingredient sourcing or manufacturing transparency reports, and has not made public commitments to PFAS phase-out. No major product recalls or safety controversies specific to this line are on record. The brand follows FDA compliance for antiperspirant active ingredients but does not exceed standard disclosure norms for the mass-market deodorant segment.

How it compares in its category

Mitchum is a mainstream antiperspirant positioned mid-market; aluminum chlorohydrate is the most common antiperspirant active globally and is considered safe by FDA and dermatological bodies at concentrations under 20%. This unscented formulation avoids fragrance allergens that affect many competitors. It is more conventional (and slightly less transparent) than premium brands like Lavanila or Kopari, which publish fuller ingredient chains, but comparable in safety profile to drugstore alternatives like Degree or Secret.

If you buy it

Apply only to clean, dry skin to minimize irritation and ensure efficacy. Do not use on broken or irritated skin. Replace the roll-on if the applicator becomes visibly contaminated or the formula dries out (typically 6-12 months of regular use). Store in a cool, dry place away from heat, as the water-based formula can separate or degrade if exposed to temperatures above 30C (86F).

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Mitchum has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.