PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall6/ 100Bad
MR. Dry Bag 2.0

· Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

MR. Dry Bag 2.0

Bad

Dry bag with water-repellent coating, PFAS status unclear; ask the brand.

Verdict · SkipRipstop nylon dry bag with water-repellent coating; PFAS status unconfirmed by the brand, other textile hazards minimal but water-repellent coating chemistry warrants clarification before purchase.

This ripstop nylon pack has water-resistant treatment but no PFAS or water-repellent coating chemistry details from the brand. Third-party lab data isn't publicly available either.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Ripstop nylon with water-repellent coating treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What MR. Dry Bag 2.0 is made of, ingredients and materials

The MR. Dry Bag 2.0 uses ripstop nylon, a tightly woven polyamide fabric reinforced with thicker yarns to resist tearing. It is treated with a water-repellent (water-repellent coating) finish, which is the main chemical concern, water-repellent coating coatings are often applied using fluorinated compounds, though some manufacturers now use non-fluorinated alternatives. The brand has not publicly disclosed whether their water-repellent coating treatment contains PFAS or is PFAS-free. The ripstop nylon itself poses minimal risk if used as intended (the polymer is inert when not heated).

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

If the water-repellent coating treatment uses older fluorinated formulations, it may shed micro-particles or leach fluorinated compounds into water or skin contact over extended use. The brand's silence on this chemistry is the primary flag.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and particle shedding

Water-repellent coating coatings on any nylon bag degrade with age, heat, and UV exposure. As the coating wears, loose polymer particles and residual coating chemicals may shed into contents or handling environments; this is a documented aging hazard for all treated fabrics, not unique to the brand.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No documented formaldehyde resin use reported in ripstop nylon dry bags; industrial nylon finishing typically avoids formaldehyde. Standard textile risk but not confirmed in this product.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Azo dyes

No public recall or testing data for restricted azo dyes in ripstop products. Outdoor gear nylon is typically dyed with reactive dyes, which carry lower regulatory concern than azo.

95/ 100
✅

Antimony in polyester/nylon

Ripstop nylon does not typically contain antimony catalysts (those are primarily used in polyester production). Risk is negligible for this material class.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

The brand is a reputable outdoor gear manufacturer but has not published transparent statements on PFAS use in their product line. The company does not list PFAS certifications (such as OEKO-TEX or bluesign) for this product on available product pages. Direct contact with the brand is the only reliable way to confirm the water-repellent coating chemistry used on the Dry Bag 2.0.

How it compares in its category

Ripstop nylon dry bags are industry standard for outdoor gear; this material choice has lower concern than PVC alternatives, which can off-gas phthalates. Many competitor brands (Patagonia, Black Diamond) now offer PFAS-free or transparently labeled water-repellent coating options. The MR. Dry Bag 2.0 does not stand out as a leader in chemical transparency, placing it in the middle of the market for safety disclosure.

If you buy it

Store the bag away from heat and direct sunlight when not in use to avoid accelerating any coating degradation. Before purchase, email customer service asking specifically whether the water-repellent coating treatment is PFAS-free; if they cannot confirm, consider alternatives with certified non-fluorinated coatings. Rinse the bag gently with cool water after use in salt water, as salt can degrade water-repellent coating finishes over time. Replace the bag if the coating shows visible peeling or cracking, as this may increase particle shedding.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to MR. Dry Bag 2.0?

REI Co-op Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

REI Co-op

Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Polypropylene storage bin, no water-resistant coating mentioned
  • UV degradation and additive leaching

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Marmot Tool Box

Marmot

Tool Box

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified
  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polyester and nylon manufacturing

5 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Patagonia Disperser Roll Top Pack 40L

Patagonia

Disperser Roll Top Pack 40L

45PoorPFAS grade
  • Recycled polyester with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • PFAS

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.