PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall4/ 100Bad
Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Dry-Touch Sunscreen SPF 45 Value Pack

Neutrogena Ultra Sheer · Sunscreen

Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Dry-Touch Sunscreen SPF 45 Value Pack

Poor

Skip until Neutrogena discloses waterproofing chemistry or third-party verification.

Verdict: SkipSunscreen with undisclosed water-resistant chemistry and PFAS concerns; acceptable if applied correctly, but seek PFAS-transparent alternatives when available.

This water-resistant sunscreen is marketed for 80-minute durability, a feature historically linked to PFAS-based water-repellent treatments, yet the brand provides no ingredient disclosure or PFAS statement. No lab testing confirms the waterproofing agent's composition.

The safe swap

Raw Elements Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30

Raw Elements

Raw Elements Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Water-resistant sunscreen lotion (organic/mineral UV filters, waterproofing agents unspecified)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and irritants

Neutrogena Ultra Sheer is fragrance-containing; fragrance mixes can trigger contact dermatitis or respiratory sensitivity in 1-3% of users, particularly those with atopic dermatitis or asthma. No specific allergen declaration beyond the generic 'fragrance' listing is required by US law.

70/ 100
🧼

Parabens

Lotion sunscreens require broad-spectrum preservatives; Neutrogena's exact preservative system is not listed on public databases. Common preservatives in drugstore sunscreens can cause contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals, though true allergy is rare.

Source: FDA
70/ 100
🏷️

Undisclosed inert ingredient hazards (silicones, PEGs, or fluorochemicals in water-resista

The waterproofing mechanism is proprietary and unlabeled; water-resistant sunscreens frequently use silicone polymers (generally safe but non-biodegradable) or fluorinated compounds (PFAS-class risk). Without disclosure, users cannot assess exposure.

45/ 100
⚠️

Skin occlusion and heat retention in high-humidity or exercise settings

Lotion-based sunscreens, especially water-resistant formulas with high emollient content, can trap heat and sweat on skin during intense activity, increasing risk of heat rash or folliculitis in prone individuals. 'Dry-touch' marketing does not eliminate this risk in all body areas.

70/ 100
⚠️

Eye irritation from lotion migration

Applied to face or scalp, lotion sunscreens can migrate into eyes during sweating or water exposure, causing stinging or temporary irritation. Fragrance and preservatives amplify this risk.

70/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Dry-Touch SPF 45 is a lotion-based sunscreen combining organic (chemical) UV absorbers with water-resistant formulation to extend protection during swimming or sweating. The exact waterproofing agents are not publicly detailed by Neutrogena, which is the core safety gap: water-resistant sunscreens historically used PFAS-based silicone or fluorinated polymers to maintain efficacy in moisture. The 'dry-touch' claim suggests silicone or film-forming agents, but without ingredient transparency, users cannot verify whether fluorinated compounds are present. Lotion-form sunscreens also contain emulsifiers, preservatives, and fragrance systems that warrant independent scrutiny.

The brand's record and disclosure

Neutrogena (Johnson & Johnson subsidiary) has not publicly committed to PFAS phase-out or third-party verification of sunscreen formulations, despite growing consumer pressure in the category. The brand has faced no major FDA enforcement actions on sunscreens, but J&J's broader environmental disclosure remains limited compared to transparency leaders like Blue Lizard or Badger. Neutrogena does list active ingredients on packaging but does not specify inert or processing aids, where PFAS compounds typically hide. No independent testing data is publicly available to confirm or rule out PFAS in this specific value pack.

How it compares in its category

Ultra Sheer Dry-Touch sits in the mid-market, mass-market sunscreen segment where water-resistance formulation secrets are common and PFAS use is suspected but unconfirmed across multiple brands. Mineral-only sunscreens (zinc oxide, titanium dioxide) from brands like Badger, Blue Lizard, or Neutrogena's own mineral line avoid synthetic water-resistant chemistry altogether, eliminating the PFAS question. Chemical sunscreens from transparent manufacturers or those with third-party PFAS testing offer more assurance. This product's value-pack format and lack of environmental transparency place it below category leaders in consumer-safety disclosure, though price and broad availability make it a default for many users.

If you buy it

Apply liberally (about one ounce for full body) 15 minutes before sun exposure; reapply every two hours or immediately after swimming or heavy sweating, even though the formula claims water-resistance to 80 minutes. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat; sunscreen can degrade if left in hot cars, reducing effectiveness. Do not use past the expiration date printed on packaging. If skin irritation, rash, or burning occurs, discontinue use and rinse thoroughly; consult a dermatologist if symptoms persist. Consider patch-testing on a small arm area first if you have sensitive skin or fragrance allergies.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Neutrogena Ultra Sheer has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Sunscreen

Goddess Garden Natural Sunscreen SPF 30 6 oz

Goddess Garden

Natural Sunscreen SPF 30 6 oz

mineral-based UV filters, plant-derived waxes

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation or photosensitivity from plant oils

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern mineral sunscreen backed by credible PFAS-exclusion certification.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Raw Elements Eco Formula SPF 30 Sunscreen

Raw Elements

Eco Formula SPF 30 Sunscreen

mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide, titanium dioxide)

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide in sunlight

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation or sensitivity to mineral film

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Mineral sunscreen backed by third-party verification, no fluorochemical history.

MADE SAFE certifiedEWG Verified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Raw Elements Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30

Raw Elements

Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30

mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide/titanium dioxide), tin packaging

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
🍳

Epoxy resin coating in tin lining

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Nano particle inhalation from loose powder form

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Mineral formula plus explicit PFAS-free stance and certs lower concern.

MADE SAFE CertifiedReef Safe Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More sunscreen grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.