Nike Tour Classic IV Golf Glove
Golf glove likely treated with water-repellent coating; Nike silent on PFAS content.
Golf gloves typically receive water-resistant finishes that may contain PFAS. Nike has not disclosed PFAS use or absence for this product, and no independent testing data is available.
The better-graded swap
Top Flite
Top Flite 2026 XL Complete Set
85/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
leather with water-resistant treatment
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Nike Tour Classic IV Golf Glove is made of, ingredients and materials
The Tour Classic IV is constructed from leather (likely cabretta or similar goat/lamb leather common in golf gloves) with a water-resistant finish applied to the back or entire glove. The leather itself poses minimal acute hazard; leather tanning historically used chromium salts, but regulated tanneries in developed supply chains minimize heavy metal residue. The water-resistant treatment is the chemical concern, Nike does not disclose whether they use fluorinated water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) agents such as long-chain PFOA/PFOS precursors or newer alternatives like polysiloxanes or wax-based systems.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Azo dyes and colorant toxicity
If the glove includes dyed leather or synthetic accents, azo dyes are a potential concern in low-cost tanneries. Nike's supply chain standards nominally exclude restricted azo dyes, but explicit certification for golf gloves is not publicly confirmed.
Skin irritation or sensitization from finish chemistry
Water-resistant polyurethane or fluorinated treatments occasionally cause localized contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. No adverse event reports specific to the Tour Classic IV are documented, but hands are a high-contact zone.
What’s reassuring
Heavy metals
Modern cabretta leather from regulated tanneries (typical for Nike golf products) undergoes quality control that minimizes chromium VI and lead leachate. No toxicological alerts are documented for this specific glove model.
Source, FDA ↗Formaldehyde / VOCs
Leather golf gloves do not typically employ formaldehyde-based resins; water-resistant finishes use polyurethane or fluorochemical bases. No evidence of formaldehyde incorporation in this product category.
Source, ATSDR ↗Microplastic or synthetic shedding from synthetic overlays
This leather glove does not rely on primary synthetic materials, so microplastic shedding is not a plausible hazard. Synthetic reinforcement patches (if present) are minimal and not subject to mechanical wear.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Nike has not published specific water-repellent coating chemistry disclosures for golf gloves or committed publicly to PFAS-free water treatments across its apparel lines as of available records. The company has faced scrutiny over PFAS in footwear and has moved some product lines away from fluorinated treatments, but golf glove-specific statements are absent. No major regulatory recalls or safety alerts have been issued for this product, and no independent testing of this specific model for PFAS or other contaminants is publicly documented.
How it compares in its category
Most premium golf gloves (Titleist, Callaway, Ping) use similar leather-plus-water-repellent coating construction with comparable transparency gaps on chemical identity. Some competitors have shifted to silicone or polyurethane-based water treatments to avoid fluorochemicals; Nike has not clearly adopted this across golf. A glove is a short-duration contact item (worn during play, not worn continuously), so dermal absorption risk is lower than for apparel with extended skin contact.
If you buy it
Hand-wash with cool water and mild soap; avoid hot water and harsh detergents that can degrade the water-resistant coating and potentially mobilize residual chemicals. Do not machine wash or dry clean. Replace when grip integrity declines (typically 2-3 seasons of regular play). If you have concerns about PFAS exposure, contact Nike customer service to request water-repellent coating material specifications; lack of a clear answer suggests fluorinated chemistry. Store in a dry place to avoid mold growth in the leather, which could require chemical remediation.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Nike has made a specific claim
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Nike Tour Classic IV Golf Glove?
- Steel clubheads, graphite shafts, rubber grips
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Graphite shaft resin degradation and fiber exposure
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- Cabretta leather, likely tannin-tanned
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- leather or synthetic leather with cotton lining
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonMore golf balls & equipment grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.