PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall39/ 100Poor
Nike Women's Chill Knit Mid-Rise Ribbed Tights

Nike · Activewear

Nike Women's Chill Knit Mid-Rise Ribbed Tights

Good

Lower concern, basic athletic knit without water and stain treatments.

Verdict: SkipStandard athletic knit with no known hazards beyond normal wear; low PFAS risk; Nike's disclosure is opaque but product design carries minimal chemical burden.

This is a standard ribbed knit tight with no disclosed water-resistant, stain-resistant, or protective coatings, the primary PFAS risk vectors in apparel. Nike has not publicly committed to PFAS-free manufacturing.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon/polyester knit blend, no waterproofing or coating disclosed

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Athletic knits may use formaldehyde-releasing resins in dyeing or finishing to set colour and prevent shrinkage. Nike's RSL testing should catch excess, but specific residue levels are not published for this item. A short initial rinse before first wear minimises any inhalation or skin contact risk.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🎨

Heavy metals

Polyester and nylon are typically dyed with reactive or disperse dyes; azo dyes (which can release carcinogenic amines) are restricted under Nike's RSL but not independently verified here. Heavy metals (lead, cadmium) in dyes are similarly regulated but not transparently tested for this specific SKU.

Source: FDA
70/ 100
🫧

Microfibre shedding (synthetic textile degradation)

Nylon and polyester knits shed microfibres during washing and wear, a documented environmental and potential inhalation concern. This product's microfibre load is typical for the material class and not higher than competitors, but shedding increases as the fabric degrades; replacement timelines matter.

45/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Polyester is often polymerised using antimony trioxide as a catalyst; residual antimony can be present at trace levels (typically <1 ppm in finished fibre). Direct skin contact during wear poses minimal risk, but no transparency on antimony levels is provided for this product.

70/ 100
⚠️

Allergens from synthetic dyes and finishes

Individuals with sensitive skin may react to residual dyes, finish resins, or dye disperse agents; reactions are not common but possible, especially if tights are worn without an initial wash. People with known synthetic dye allergies should pre-wash before first wear.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

These tights are a nylon-polyester blend knit, a common pairing in athletic wear chosen for stretch, durability, and moisture management. Unlike coated or waterproofed textiles, this uncoated knit has a lower chemical footprint because it skips the fluorinated water-repellent treatments that introduce persistent PFAS. The blend itself is stable in normal use; neither nylon nor polyester leaches significantly into skin at body temperature during wear.

The brand's record and disclosure

Nike has faced scrutiny over transparency on chemical use in manufacturing but has not disclosed full fibre-to-product chemical details for this item. The brand signed the Restricted Substances List (RSL) compliance framework and performs heavy metal and formaldehyde testing as standard, but provides no public third-party certification for individual tights. No recalls or safety alerts are on record for this specific product line. Nike's silence on PFAS treatment here is consistent with the fact that untreated athletic knits typically receive no deliberate PFAS application.

How it compares in its category

Uncoated nylon-polyester athletic tights sit in the middle of the safety spectrum. They avoid the PFAS and coating-degradation risks of water-resistant or treated variants (common in premium compression or outdoor lines), but offer less specificity than brands like Patagonia or Allbirds that publish detailed material transparency reports. Most direct competitors (Adidas, Lululemon basics) use similar blends with comparable disclosure gaps.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water and dry flat or on low heat to preserve elasticity and avoid any polymer stress that could increase microfibre shedding over time. Do not bleach or use fabric softener, which can degrade the knit weave. Replace after visible pilling, seam separation, or loss of stretch (typically 40-60 wears), as degraded fabric is more likely to shed microfibres. No heat exposure during wear poses a risk; body temperature is well below the nylon or polyester degradation threshold.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Nike has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More activewear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.