PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall57/ 100Good
Old Spice Antiperspirant Deodorant

Old Spice · Deodorant

Old Spice Antiperspirant Deodorant

Excellent

Low PFAS concern; standard antiperspirant without waterproofing or specialty coatings.

Verdict: BuyAluminum antiperspirant with no established safety recalls; fragrance allergen risk typical for category; lower PFAS concern supports routine use.

This aerosol or stick antiperspirant has no documented water-resistance or grease-resistant treatments requiring PFAS. The brand makes no PFAS claims and this cosmetic category poses minimal PFAS risk.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aluminum/starch base, propellant, fragrance

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and contact sensitization

Old Spice's proprietary fragrance blend contains synthetic musks and botanical extracts; no ingredient disclosure prevents assessment of specific allergen triggers like limonene or geraniol, but fragrance-induced contact dermatitis is well-documented in antiperspirant category.

70/ 100
🔩

Aluminum absorption via skin

Aluminum zirconium compounds are the active antiperspirant ingredient. Dermal absorption of aluminum is low but measurable; epidemiological evidence does not support Alzheimer's causation, but absorption is higher on abraded or inflamed skin and in regular daily users.

45/ 100
💨

Propellant inhalation (aerosol form)

Aerosol propellants (typically hydrocarbon or compressed gas) pose low acute risk with normal use but can trigger asthma or respiratory irritation if inhaled directly or in poorly ventilated spaces; powder or stick alternatives eliminate this.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

Talc contamination

Old Spice Antiperspirant typically uses starch or silica as base powder, not talc; no known recalls or litigation linked to talc in this product line.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No public disclosure or recall history indicates formaldehyde preservatives in Old Spice Antiperspirant; standard deodorant preservatives are typically phenoxyethanol or parabens, not formaldehyde donors.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Old Spice Antiperspirant Deodorant is formulated around aluminum compounds (likely aluminum zirconium or aluminum chlorohydrate), which are the active ingredient blocking sweat, mixed with starch or silica as a base and propellant gases for aerosol delivery. The fragrance blend is proprietary; Old Spice is known for strong synthetic musk and woody notes that carry potential allergen risk. No ceramic, enamel, or specialty coatings are present, eliminating risks like lead in glazes or Teflon-type coating fume inhalation.

The brand's record and disclosure

Procter & Gamble (Old Spice parent) does not publicly disclose detailed fragrance composition or PFAS content in antiperspirant lines, though their broader transparency has improved on other product categories. No major recalls specific to Old Spice Antiperspirant exist on public record. The brand does not pursue third-party dermatological certification or allergen labeling beyond FDA ingredient listing.

How it compares in its category

Old Spice sits in the mainstream antiperspirant segment with aluminum concentrations typical for over-the-counter products (around 15-20% active). Compared to natural or aluminum-free deodorants, it offers stronger sweat blocking but higher skin sensitization potential for fragrance-reactive individuals. Versus clinical/prescription strength products, it is weaker but carries proportionally lower aluminum exposure.

If you buy it

Apply to clean, dry skin only; wet or freshly showered skin can reduce efficacy and irritate. Do not inhale aerosol spray directly; use in ventilated areas. Discontinue if rash, itching, or burning develops, as fragrance or aluminum sensitization can occur with prolonged use. Replace every 12-18 months or when product hardens or separates, as propellant degradation can affect spray consistency.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Old Spice has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.