Old Spice High Endurance Deodorant
Lower concern for a solid deodorant with no known PFAS triggers.
Old Spice High Endurance contains aluminum complexes without reported Teflon-family coating, stain-resist, or water-repellent coatings. The brand makes no PFAS statements, and no public recalls flag PFAS contamination.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
Aluminum complex salts, fragrance, starch, talc base
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
What’s concerning
No PFAS disclosure
The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
Talc contamination
Old Spice does not publicly disclose talc sourcing, purity testing, or asbestos screening. Cosmetic-grade talc is regulated by the FDA, but independent testing of consumer deodorants has occasionally detected trace asbestos; the actual risk from properly sourced talc in deodorant is very low, but brand silence on sourcing limits assurance.
Fragrance allergens and sensitivizers
Old Spice uses proprietary fragrance blends not individually itemized on the label. Fragrance is a known allergen class; individuals with sensitive skin, contact dermatitis history, or fragrance sensitivities may experience irritation, but this is a recognized category risk rather than a brand-specific defect.
Coating or stick degradation and bacterial growth
Solid deodorant sticks can develop surface cracks, grooves, or moisture entrapment over time, especially in humid bathrooms, creating niches for bacterial or fungal growth. Replacement and storage in dry conditions mitigates this risk, which is not unique to Old Spice but inherent to the solid stick format.
Skin irritation and contact sensitization
Aluminum salts and fragrances can trigger localized dermatitis, particularly in individuals with history of eczema, psoriasis, or sensitive skin; reactions are typically mild and reversible upon discontinuation. Old Spice has not reported widespread safety alerts, but individual sensitivity is not uncommon in this product class.
What’s reassuring
Safe base material
Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.
Aluminum complex salt systemic absorption
Topical aluminum deodorant application does not result in meaningful systemic uptake or accumulation at normal use levels; peer-reviewed evidence does not support a causal link between deodorant aluminum and Alzheimer's disease or other systemic harm. This hazard is not established in literature for typical exposure.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Old Spice High Endurance is a solid stick deodorant built on aluminum zirconium or aluminum chlorohydrate complexes, which block sweat ducts through a physical mechanism rather than antimicrobial action. The base includes talc (a mineral powder filler), fragrance compounds, and starch to control moisture and texture. Aluminum salts in deodorants are topically applied and do not enter systemic circulation in meaningful amounts at typical use levels; the talc component is the primary material concern in this formulation.
The brand's record and disclosure
Procter & Gamble (Old Spice's parent) does not publicly disclose detailed ingredient sourcing, heavy metal testing, or talc supplier auditing for this product line. No major product recalls for Old Spice deodorant safety are on record with the FDA or CPSC. The brand has not committed to third-party cosmetic certifications (such as EWG Verified or Natural Products Association) and remains silent on talc purity standards and PFAS avoidance policies.
How it compares in its category
Old Spice High Endurance is a mainstream aluminum-based deodorant, typical of mass-market offerings; it sits in the middle range for transparency. Alternatives like Crystal (mineral salt), Kopari (coconut-based), and Schmidt's (plant starch) offer higher ingredient disclosure or talc-free formulations, while drugstore brands (Dove, Secret) have similar aluminum chemistry with comparable disclosure gaps. This product does not stand out negatively within its category but also offers no premium safety or transparency advantage.
If you buy it
Apply to clean, dry skin and avoid contact with broken skin, eyes, or mucous membranes. Replace the stick every 4-6 months or when degraded to prevent uneven application and potential bacterial growth in grooves. If skin irritation, rash, or persistent itching develops, discontinue use; aluminum sensitivity is rare but documented. Store in cool, dry conditions away from heat to preserve the solid structure and fragrance stability.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Old Spice has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Safer alternatives in Deodorant
Puracy
Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass
Glass jar; water-based cream formula
Fragrance allergens
Limited concern
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Limited concern
Glass container breakage
Moderate concern
Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.
✓Bare metal or glass, no coating at all
Tom's of Maine
Deodorant
mineral-based, baking soda formulation
Fragrance allergen content
Limited concern
Baking soda skin irritation
Moderate concern
Microplastic shedding
Limited concern
Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle
mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation
Fragrance allergens
Limited concern
Skin irritation from mineral salts
Limited concern
Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.
⚠Risky category by default
More deodorant grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.