PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Outdoor Products 40L Surf Dry Bag

Outdoor Products · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

Outdoor Products 40L Surf Dry Bag

Bad

Skip unless brand confirms waterproof coating is PFAS-free.

Verdict · SkipPFAS-based waterproof coating unconfirmed; brand has not disclosed the chemistry; alternatives with lower PFAS concern exist.

The dry bag requires waterproof coating for water protection, which often means PFAS-based treatment. The brand provides no information about what coating it uses or PFAS status.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Unspecified waterproof coating on fabric

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Without disclosure, the coating chemistry is unknown. If it contains legacy PFAS (standard in low-cost outdoor gear until recently), trace amounts may leach into water or stored food items, especially if the coating degrades. Fluorine-free alternatives are less well-characterized for leaching but generally pose lower bioaccumulation risk.

Source, ATSDR
20/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from coating degradation

Waterproof coatings degrade with age, UV exposure, and flexing. Shedding of microscopic coating particles into stored items or the environment is a known issue in lower-cost waterproofed textiles. No specific data exists for this product, but budget gear typically has less durable coating systems.

70/ 100
💨

Off-gassing of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from coating or adhesives

Polyurethane or acrylic-based waterproof coatings and fabric lamination adhesives can emit low levels of VOCs during the first weeks of use or storage in warm conditions. Odor and headache are occasional complaints but depend on formulation. Outdoor storage and airing reduce exposure significantly.

70/ 100
⚠️

Mold or bacterial growth inside sealed compartments

Dry bags create airtight environments; if stored damp or in humid conditions, fungal growth is a practical risk, though not a chemical hazard. Ensure contents and interior are completely dry before sealing. This is a use and maintenance issue, not a material defect.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or test results on record for Outdoor Products dry bags. Standard polyester and nylon base fabrics may contain residual heavy metals from dyes (cadmium, lead) if not rigorously sourced, but this is not a known issue specific to this brand.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This dry bag uses an unspecified waterproof coating applied to fabric (likely polyester or nylon base). Waterproof coatings on outdoor gear are traditionally formulated with PFAS (PFAS "forever chemicals") because fluorine compounds repel both water and oil. Without manufacturer disclosure of the specific coating chemistry, you cannot determine whether it contains legacy PFAS, newer alternatives like fluorine-free hydrophobic polymers, or proprietary blends. The coating durability and leaching potential depend entirely on the binder system and formulation.

The brand's record and disclosure

Outdoor Products maintains minimal public disclosure on waterproof coating chemistry and has not published statements on PFAS avoidance or material transparency. No third-party certifications (such as GOTS, bluesign, or OEKO-TEX) are listed for this product. The brand's silence on PFAS in waterproofing is typical for lower-cost outdoor gear manufacturers but leaves consumers without assurance of alternatives with lower concern. No major recalls or controversies are on record for this specific product line.

How it compares in its category

Budget-tier dry bags from this brand sit below premium competitors like Sea to Summit, Aqua Quest, or Patagonia, most of which now disclose coating type or claim fluorine-free formulations. Mid-market alternatives explicitly market PFAS-free polyurethane or silicone coatings. Outdoor Products' lack of specification places it in a category where PFAS risk is unquantified, making comparison difficult. For the same price point, competing brands increasingly offer transparent waterproofing alternatives.

If you buy it

Limit exposure by storing it in a dry location and avoid hand-washing or prolonged water contact that might accelerate coating degradation and leaching. Do not machine wash; rinse gently with cool water only. Inspect the coating annually for cracks, peeling, or cloudiness; replace if degradation is visible. Store away from heat sources and direct sunlight, as UV and thermal stress degrade Teflon-family coating and may increase particle shedding into stored items.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Outdoor Products has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

REI Co-op Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

REI Co-op

Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

Polypropylene storage bin, no water-resistant coating mentioned

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade53Good

UV degradation and additive leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Limited concern

70
🏭

Odor and volatile organic compounds from manufacturing

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern for bare plastic storage container.

Starting grade for this product type

Marmot Tool Box

Marmot

Tool Box

Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade39Poor
🏭

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polyester and nylon manufacturing

Limited concern

70
🍳

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating chemistry unknown

Moderate concern

45
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored polyester components

Limited concern

70

Verify this is not a garment and check for any water-repellent coating applied.

Starting grade for this product type

Patagonia Guidewater Roll-Top Pack

Patagonia

Guidewater Roll-Top Pack

nylon ripstop with water-repellent coating finish

PFAS Grade45Poor
Overall Grade33Poor
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Nylon microplastic shedding (abrasion)

Limited concern

70

Degradation and leachate from aging water-repellent coating

Limited concern

70

A water-repellent or grease-resistant treatment of unstated chemistry, with a brand PFAS statement we have not verified.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.