PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Outdoor Products All Purpose Dry Sacks

Outdoor Products · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

Outdoor Products All Purpose Dry Sacks

Bad

Ask brand about waterproof coating chemistry before buying these sacks.

Verdict · SkipDry sack material and water-repellent coating chemistry undisclosed; no major non-PFAS hazards reported, but brand transparency gap warrants cautious use pending PFAS clarification.

These dry sacks use waterproof water-repellent coating for water protection, but the brand does not reveal what chemicals create the waterproof effect. You cannot verify PFAS content without brand transparency.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Fabric with waterproof water-repellent coating, type unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🍳

water-repellent coating volatilization (thermal)

If the coating contains legacy PFAS or other volatile additives, exposure risk is low under normal storage and use but could increase with heat, direct sunlight, or mechanical stress. No specific thermal data for this product model is available.

70/ 100
🍂

Coating adhesion and microparticle shedding over time

As water-repellent coating coatings degrade with age and washing, microscopic particles may shed into water or soil during outdoor use. Long-term environmental impact is poorly characterized, and this product carries no durability or shedding warranty in public materials.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in fabric base

No documented azo dye concerns or safety violations reported for Outdoor Products dry sacks. Nylon and polyester bases are typically low-risk for azo dye contamination, though certification data would confirm this.

95/ 100

Antimony in polyester (if used)

If the fabric base is 100% polyester, antimony catalysts may be present at trace levels, but external-use dry sacks present negligible skin or ingestion risk. No recalls or testing data specific to this product indicate elevated antimony.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Waterproof coatings and fabric finishes may contain formaldehyde releasers, but no public safety alerts or testing results for Outdoor Products dry sacks document this hazard. Off-gassing from external gear is minimal given low surface contact.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Outdoor Products All Purpose Dry Sacks are constructed from a fabric base (likely nylon or polyester) treated with a waterproof water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating of unspecified chemistry. water-repellent coating coatings historically relied on PFAS compounds to achieve water resistance, though some manufacturers have shifted to alternatives not linked to PFAS in recent years. The brand has not publicly disclosed which chemistry it uses, making the actual hazard profile of the coating unknown without direct testing or brand statement.

The brand's record and disclosure

Outdoor Products maintains a minimal public stance on chemical composition and safety certifications. No major recalls or safety controversies specific to this dry sack line are documented in public records. The brand has not released statements about PFAS-free coatings, fluorine-free waterproofing, or third-party certifications (such as STANDARD 100 or Bluesign approval), which are increasingly expected for apparel and gear in this category.

How it compares in its category

Dry sacks occupy a niche in outdoor gear where waterproofing is essential but exposure is typically external and short-term. Competitors like Sea to Summit and Patagonia have begun disclosing water-repellent coating chemistry or committing to PFAS reduction, while other budget brands remain silent. Outdoor Products' lack of transparency places it in the middle-to-lower disclosure tier; many outdoor retailers now flag non-compliant gear and some brands have already eliminated older PFAS-based water-repellent coating formulations.

If you buy it

Dry sacks are low-contact external gear with minimal ingestion or inhalation risk. Store in a cool, dry location away from direct heat (do not dry-clean or tumble-dry at high temperature, which can degrade coatings and release volatiles). Avoid prolonged skin contact with wet coating if you have sensitive skin, and rinse hands after extended handling. Inspect seams and coating for wear annually; replace if waterproofing visibly degrades or flakes, as this signals breakdown of the water-repellent coating layer.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Outdoor Products has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

REI Co-op Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

REI Co-op

Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

Polypropylene storage bin, no water-resistant coating mentioned

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade53Good

UV degradation and additive leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Limited concern

70
🏭

Odor and volatile organic compounds from manufacturing

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern for bare plastic storage container.

Starting grade for this product type

Marmot Tool Box

Marmot

Tool Box

Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade39Poor
🏭

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polyester and nylon manufacturing

Limited concern

70
🍳

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating chemistry unknown

Moderate concern

45
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored polyester components

Limited concern

70

Verify this is not a garment and check for any water-repellent coating applied.

Starting grade for this product type

Patagonia Guidewater Roll-Top Pack

Patagonia

Guidewater Roll-Top Pack

nylon ripstop with water-repellent coating finish

PFAS Grade45Poor
Overall Grade33Poor
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Nylon microplastic shedding (abrasion)

Limited concern

70

Degradation and leachate from aging water-repellent coating

Limited concern

70

A water-repellent or grease-resistant treatment of unstated chemistry, with a brand PFAS statement we have not verified.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.