PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Outdoor Products Go Dry Bag

Outdoor Products · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

Outdoor Products Go Dry Bag

Bad

Skip until the brand reveals coating contents.

Verdict · SkipWaterproof coating composition undisclosed; formaldehyde-resin risk in fabric finishing typical of this category. Brand silence on PFAS warrants caution; lower concern if used for dry-storage only.

Outdoor Products refuses to detail what waterproof coating treats this dry bag or mention PFAS. Waterproof finishes commonly use PFAS, so brand silence means you should be cautious.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Fabric with unspecified waterproof/water-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Coating composition is undisclosed; legacy PFC-based waterproof treatments were standard in this product category until ~2015. Outdoor Products has not stated whether the coating is PFC-free, making PFAS presence unconfirmed but plausible, especially in a budget-tier product.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Fabric finishing for water resistance and wrinkle-set commonly involves formaldehyde-releasing urea-formaldehyde or melamine-formaldehyde resins. These are not listed in product specs but are standard textile industry practice; off-gassing risk is higher in warm, humid storage or use.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100

Coating degradation and leachate release

Unspecified waterproof coatings degrade over time, especially with UV, heat, or friction. Peeling or delaminating coatings can release coating monomers and solvents; this has been noted in consumer reports for budget-tier waterproof gear but no formal recall exists for this specific product.

45/ 100
💨

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) off-gassing

Polyurethane and acrylic waterproof coatings off-gas VOCs during manufacture and storage; this is transient but can be detected as a chemical smell, especially in sealed bags. Outdoor Products does not specify curing time or VOC content; off-gassing diminishes over weeks to months of airing.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No specific heavy metal contamination is documented for Outdoor Products dry bags. However, if the bag is brightly colored, metal-complex or azo dyes used in polyester and nylon fabrics can contain trace heavy metals (lead, cadmium); unbranded or untested batches carry slightly higher risk.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Outdoor Products Go Dry Bag uses an unspecified waterproof or water-resistant fabric coating, which is the critical unknown. Most waterproof coatings in consumer dry bags are either polyurethane, acrylic-based, or PFC/PFAS compounds. The fabric substrate itself likely contains formaldehyde-release resins used in fabric finishing to improve wrinkle resistance and dimensional stability. Without disclosure, you cannot rule out legacy PFC treatments or novel alternatives that may off-gas or leach in warm or wet conditions.

The brand's record and disclosure

Outdoor Products has not publicly disclosed the chemical composition of its waterproof coatings or committed to PFAS-free alternatives on record. The brand maintains minimal transparency on fabric treatment chemistry or third-party certifications (such as Bluesign, OEKO-TEX, or GOTS). This silence is notable given industry-wide movement toward PFC disclosure following EPA and international restrictions on PFOA and PFOS. No major recalls or safety controversies specific to this product line are documented.

How it compares in its category

Outdoor dry bags typically fall into a mid-market tier where PFAS-free and certified alternatives are increasingly available (Patagonia, REI Co-op, some Osprey models explicitly label non-fluorinated coatings). Outdoor Products does not market this bag as PFAS-free or certified-safe, positioning it as a budget option. For comparable price, you can find competitors with disclosed coatings or third-party certification; the lack of transparency here is the differentiator, not the price.

If you buy it

Use the bag exclusively for dry storage; do not allow it to come into prolonged contact with food, skin, or hot liquids. Air dry after wet exposure rather than machine washing, which can accelerate coating degradation and potential leachate release. Replace the bag if the coating shows visible cracking, peeling, or delamination, as this signals failure and exposure to fabric chemicals. Store in a cool, dry location away from direct sunlight to slow off-gassing of any residual formaldehyde or solvent vapors in the fabric.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Outdoor Products has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

REI Co-op Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

REI Co-op

Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

Polypropylene storage bin, no water-resistant coating mentioned

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade53Good

UV degradation and additive leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Limited concern

70
🏭

Odor and volatile organic compounds from manufacturing

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern for bare plastic storage container.

Starting grade for this product type

Marmot Tool Box

Marmot

Tool Box

Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade39Poor
🏭

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polyester and nylon manufacturing

Limited concern

70
🍳

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating chemistry unknown

Moderate concern

45
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored polyester components

Limited concern

70

Verify this is not a garment and check for any water-repellent coating applied.

Starting grade for this product type

Patagonia Guidewater Roll-Top Pack

Patagonia

Guidewater Roll-Top Pack

nylon ripstop with water-repellent coating finish

PFAS Grade45Poor
Overall Grade33Poor
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Nylon microplastic shedding (abrasion)

Limited concern

70

Degradation and leachate from aging water-repellent coating

Limited concern

70

A water-repellent or grease-resistant treatment of unstated chemistry, with a brand PFAS statement we have not verified.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.