PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Outdoor Products Ultimate Dry Sack 3-Pack

Outdoor Products · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

Outdoor Products Ultimate Dry Sack 3-Pack

Bad

Likely uses PFAS-based water-repellent coating. Brand won't confirm.

Verdict · SkipNylon/polyester dry sacks carry unconfirmed water-repellent coating-PFAS risk and unknown coating chemistry; brand transparency absent. Use cautiously, avoid prolonged skin contact, replace if coating degrades.

Outdoor Products won't disclose what waterproof coating they use on this dry sack or whether it contains PFAS. Most waterproof textiles rely on PFAS treatments, but no testing data exists for this model.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon/polyester with waterproof coating, unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🍳

water-repellent coating chemistry (fluorinated or fluorine-free unknown)

Nylon/polyester dry sacks typically use water-repellent coating finishes; fluorinated versions carry PFAS exposure risk on skin contact and during washing. Outdoor Products does not disclose whether their coating is PFAS-based or an alternative, making assessment of exposure likelihood impossible without laboratory analysis.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle shedding

As the waterproof coating ages, flaking or peeling releases microparticles that may contain coating polymers and residual fluorochemicals (if PFAS-based). This risk increases with UV exposure and mechanical wear, particularly in sun-exposed storage or repeated washing.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in polyester or nylon fabric

No recalls or complaints on record for Outdoor Products dry sacks regarding azo dye toxicity. Standard nylon and polyester textiles manufactured to Oeko-Tex or similar standards minimize this risk, but Outdoor Products does not publish dye or dyeing certifications.

95/ 100

Antimony in polyester

Antimony (catalyst residue) in polyester fabric is regulated in many markets but not formally banned in the US. No specific hazard reports exist for Outdoor Products dry sacks. Exposure is minimal unless fabric is chewed or ingested.

95/ 100

VOC off-gassing from adhesives or solvents in coating application

Polyurethane or other waterproof coating adhesives may release trace volatile compounds during manufacture. No off-gassing complaints are on record for this brand or product line, and typical use (outdoor, open-air) minimizes inhalation exposure.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Outdoor Products Ultimate Dry Sacks are constructed from nylon or polyester fabric with an unspecified waterproof coating. The coating is the chemical weak point, waterproof textiles typically rely on water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finishes, historically PFOA/PFAS-based, though some modern alternatives exist. Nylon and polyester themselves are chemically stable in normal use, but the coating's identity and degradation pathway are unknown for this product.

The brand's record and disclosure

Outdoor Products has not published materials certifications, PFAS sourcing statements, or independent testing results for this product line. The brand remains silent on whether water-repellent coating coatings use fluorinated or fluorine-free chemistry. This absence of disclosure is notable in a category where competitors increasingly communicate coating composition due to consumer and regulatory pressure around PFAS.

How it compares in its category

Dry sacks are a commodity item; Outdoor Products is a budget-tier brand competing on price rather than material transparency. Premium outdoor brands (e.g., Patagonia, Sea to Summit) increasingly use PFAS-free water-repellent coating or disclose fluorinated chemistry. Outdoor Products' silence places it below the transparency baseline now common in performance textiles, though the functional performance of budget dry sacks is largely equivalent.

If you buy it

Avoid prolonged skin contact if you have sensitive skin or chemical sensitivities; wash hands after handling. Do not heat-treat or machine-wash at high temperatures, as coating breakdown can accelerate chemical leaching. Inspect coating annually for flaking, peeling, or discoloration; replace the sack if the waterproof layer visibly degrades. Store in a cool, dry place to slow coating oxidation.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Outdoor Products has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

REI Co-op Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

REI Co-op

Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

Polypropylene storage bin, no water-resistant coating mentioned

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade53Good

UV degradation and additive leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Limited concern

70
🏭

Odor and volatile organic compounds from manufacturing

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern for bare plastic storage container.

Starting grade for this product type

Marmot Tool Box

Marmot

Tool Box

Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade39Poor
🏭

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polyester and nylon manufacturing

Limited concern

70
🍳

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating chemistry unknown

Moderate concern

45
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored polyester components

Limited concern

70

Verify this is not a garment and check for any water-repellent coating applied.

Starting grade for this product type

Patagonia Guidewater Roll-Top Pack

Patagonia

Guidewater Roll-Top Pack

nylon ripstop with water-repellent coating finish

PFAS Grade45Poor
Overall Grade33Poor
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Nylon microplastic shedding (abrasion)

Limited concern

70

Degradation and leachate from aging water-repellent coating

Limited concern

70

A water-repellent or grease-resistant treatment of unstated chemistry, with a brand PFAS statement we have not verified.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.