PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall8/ 100Bad
Outdoor Products Watertight Gear Expandable 40L White Dry Bag

Outdoor Products · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

Outdoor Products Watertight Gear Expandable 40L White Dry Bag

Bad

Skip. Waterproof coating unspecified, no PFAS transparency.

Verdict · SkipWaterproof coating chemistry unspecified and PFAS risk unaddressed by brand; material itself (PVC/TPU) poses minor leaching risk if degraded. Use with caution and avoid prolonged skin contact.

Dry bags typically use water-repellent coating or PFC coatings for water resistance. Outdoor Products provides no material or PFAS disclosure, limiting your ability to make an informed choice.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

PVC or TPU dry bag with unspecified waterproof coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🧴

Phthalate leaching (PVC plasticizer migration)

If this bag is PVC, dibutyl phthalate (DBP) or similar plasticizers are likely present to keep the material flexible. Leaching increases with heat, skin oils, and prolonged contact. Risk is low for occasional use but rises if used to store wet clothing against bare skin for hours.

70/ 100
💨

Waterproof coating degradation and off-gassing

PVC and TPU coatings (especially solvent-applied ones) can off-gas volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during and shortly after manufacturing. The unspecified coating makes it impossible to assess if PFAS, isocyanates, or other respiratory irritants are present. New bags may smell; ventilate before use indoors.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from coating wear

As the waterproof coating flexes and degrades over years of use, small particles may detach. If the bag contacts food or drinking water directly, microplastic ingestion is a non-zero risk. Use an inner liner for food storage.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

The white pigmentation is likely titanium dioxide (TiO2), which is stable and low-risk. No public testing or recalls have identified heavy metal contaminants in Outdoor Products dry bags, but the brand's lack of testing disclosure means this remains unverified.

Source, FDA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Dry bags are usually all synthetic (PVC or TPU) with minimal fabric. If nylon or polyester reinforcement is present, formaldehyde-based resins are possible but unlikely to off-gas significantly into the bag interior. No established risk for this product.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This dry bag is constructed from either PVC (polyvinyl chloride) or TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane), materials chosen for water resistance. Both require waterproof coatings or lamination to function, and the brand has not disclosed which coating is used. PVC itself can leach plasticizers (phthalates) under heat or prolonged contact with skin oils; TPU is more chemically stable but still depends on its coating. The unspecified coating is the critical unknown, it may contain PFAS, which the brand has not addressed.

The brand's record and disclosure

Outdoor Products has published no transparency statements on waterproof coating chemistry, PFAS use, or material certifications for this product line. The brand does not appear in major sustainable gear databases or third-party testing registries. No recalled safety issues have been documented for this specific product, but the silence on coating disclosure is a red flag in an industry where PFAS-free alternatives exist.

How it compares in its category

Dry bags span a wide spectrum, budget models (like this one) typically use PVC or TPU with unspecified coatings, while premium brands (e.g., Patagonia, Klattermusen) disclose PFAS-free or recycled materials and submit to third-party testing. Mid-range alternatives from Sea to Summit or Ortlieb publish coating specs. This product sits in the lower-disclosure tier, where material safety is assumed rather than verified.

If you buy it

Avoid prolonged skin contact with the interior if storing items like wet clothes or swimwear; line it with cotton if needed to minimize phthalate or coating exposure. Do not expose to direct sunlight for extended periods, as UV can degrade PVC and increase leaching. Inspect the seams and coating annually for cracks or peeling; a degraded bag should be replaced. Wash the exterior occasionally with cool water and mild soap, not hot water or solvents.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Outdoor Products has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

REI Co-op Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

REI Co-op

Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

Polypropylene storage bin, no water-resistant coating mentioned

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade53Good

UV degradation and additive leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Limited concern

70
🏭

Odor and volatile organic compounds from manufacturing

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern for bare plastic storage container.

Starting grade for this product type

Marmot Tool Box

Marmot

Tool Box

Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade39Poor
🏭

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polyester and nylon manufacturing

Limited concern

70
🍳

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating chemistry unknown

Moderate concern

45
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored polyester components

Limited concern

70

Verify this is not a garment and check for any water-repellent coating applied.

Starting grade for this product type

Patagonia Guidewater Roll-Top Pack

Patagonia

Guidewater Roll-Top Pack

nylon ripstop with water-repellent coating finish

PFAS Grade45Poor
Overall Grade33Poor
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Nylon microplastic shedding (abrasion)

Limited concern

70

Degradation and leachate from aging water-repellent coating

Limited concern

70

A water-repellent or grease-resistant treatment of unstated chemistry, with a brand PFAS statement we have not verified.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.