PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Patagonia Men's Back Step Shirt

Patagonia · Wrinkle-Free Dress Shirts

Patagonia Men's Back Step Shirt

Bad

Likely lower concern, but Patagonia keeps water-repellent coating chemistry undisclosed.

Verdict: SkipRecycled polyester dress shirt with responsible brand stewardship, undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry presents low-probability risk vs. mainstream alternatives.

Patagonia's Back Step Shirt uses recycled polyester with water-repellent coating finish. Patagonia will not say if the water-repellent coating treatment contains PFAS or is PFAS-free.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Recycled polyester with water-repellent coating finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Patagonia's undisclosed water-repellent coating formulation may include short-chain PFAS, silicone polymers, or wax-based alternatives; none pose documented acute skin risk, but long-term environmental fate is unclear without chemical transparency.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding during wash

Polyester garments shed microplastics during laundering, especially in first 5-10 washes; this is a category-wide issue unrelated to water-repellent coating or recycled content. Use a microfiber-retention washing bag to reduce environmental release.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in polyester

Recycled polyester and Patagonia's Bluesign certification reduce but do not eliminate azo-dye risk; no recalls or testing failures reported for this product line.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

This shirt avoids formaldehyde-based wrinkle-resist treatments by using polyester structure instead; no formaldehyde-releaser residues detected in typical Patagonia testing disclosures.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Antimony catalyst residues in polyester

Recycled polyester may retain trace antimony from original synthesis, but no studies document leaching into skin or sweat at levels of concern in finished garments.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Back Step Shirt is constructed from recycled polyester with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the fabric. Recycled polyester itself carries minimal chemical risk compared to virgin polyester, though the water-repellent coating finish chemistry is the critical unknown: conventional water-repellent coating treatments historically used long-chain PFAS, but many brands have shifted to safer alternatives (short-chain PFAS, silicone-based, or non-fluorinated systems). Patagonia's specific water-repellent coating formulation is not publicly disclosed, making definitive assessment impossible.

The brand's record and disclosure

Patagonia has publicly committed to phasing out PFAS-based treatments and eliminated Teflon-type coating from most product lines by the early 2020s, though they have not published a complete chemical inventory or third-party water-repellent coating certifications for all garments. The brand maintains Bluesign and Fair Trade certifications for many products, signaling supply-chain accountability, but remains silent on the specific water-repellent coating chemistry in this shirt. Their overall stance reflects cautious progress rather than full transparency.

How it compares in its category

Wrinkle-free dress shirts typically rely on formaldehyde-based or polyester-based finishes to achieve easy-care properties; this product substitutes recycled polyester as the base structure, avoiding legacy polyester issues. Many mainstream competitors (Lands' End, Brooks Brothers, J.Crew) either do not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry or use older PFAS formulations. Patagonia's use of recycled content and public PFAS-reduction statements place it ahead of typical category offerings, though still short of full disclosure.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water and air-dry or tumble-dry on low heat to preserve water-repellent coating longevity; avoid chlorine bleach and fabric softeners, which degrade water resistance. The shirt typically maintains water-repellent coating effectiveness for 50-100 washes before reapplication may be needed (Patagonia offers water-repellent coating re-treatment services). No special precautions needed beyond standard garment care; off-gassing of volatile organics is negligible in polyester vs. formaldehyde-treated cotton alternatives.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Patagonia has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Wrinkle-Free Dress Shirts

Men's Slim-Fit Dress Shirt

Banana Republic

Men's Slim-Fit Dress Shirt

Cotton/cotton-blend woven fabric

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower PFAS concern for untreated cotton dress shirt, though brand silence remains.

Risky category by default

Patagonia Men's Farrier's Work Shirt

Patagonia

Men's Farrier's Work Shirt

Organic cotton, standard construction

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower PFAS risk from basic work shirt; no water-resistant coating expected.

Risky category by default

Tommy Hilfiger Men's Dress Shirt Regular Fit

Tommy Hilfiger

Men's Dress Shirt Regular Fit

100% cotton shirting

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower PFAS concern from untreated cotton dress shirt with no performance claims.

Risky category by default

More wrinkle-free dress shirts grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.