PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall2/ 100Bad
Tommy Hilfiger Regular Fit Wrinkle Resistant Stretch Dress Shirt

Tommy Hilfiger · Wrinkle-Free Dress Shirts

Tommy Hilfiger Regular Fit Wrinkle Resistant Stretch Dress Shirt

Bad

Moderate PFAS concern from wrinkle and stain resistance without disclosure.

Verdict: SkipModerate PFAS risk from undisclosed finishes; no other established hazards documented. Safe with informed laundering practices.

This dress shirt combines cotton with synthetic stretch and wrinkle-resistant and stain-resistant finishes, exactly the type historically associated with PFAS in textiles. Tommy Hilfiger provides no PFAS disclosure.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Cotton blend with wrinkle-resistant and stain-resistant finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Cotton wrinkle-resistant finishes commonly use formaldehyde-releasing compounds. New garments may off-gas low levels of formaldehyde; washing before first wear reduces this. No specific formaldehyde test results for this product are publicly available.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Stain-resistant coatings on apparel are typically PFAS-based. This hazard is graded separately per instructions, but noted here: undisclosed chemistry is a significant transparency gap in this product category.

Source: ATSDR
45/ 100
🫧

Finish degradation and microparticle shedding

Over time, wrinkle-resistant coatings can flake or shed, particularly after repeated washing and drying. The composition and shedding characteristics of this specific finish are unknown due to lack of brand disclosure.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in fabric or printing

No recalls or testing results specific to Tommy Hilfiger dress shirts for restricted azo dyes have been documented. Cotton-polyester blends can carry this risk, but no brand-specific evidence exists for this product.

95/ 100

Antimony in polyester component

If the blend contains significant polyester (common in wrinkle-resistant cotton blends), trace antimony may be present as a catalyst residue. No testing or regulatory action specific to Tommy Hilfiger apparel has been reported.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This shirt is a cotton blend with wrinkle-resistant and stain-resistant finishes applied to the fabric surface. Wrinkle-resistant finishes on cotton typically use formaldehyde-based resins (such as DMDHEU or methylol compounds) or, increasingly, fluorocarbon coatings (PFAS). Stain resistance almost always indicates PFAS chemistry, most commonly perfluorooctanoic acid derivatives or similar long-chain fluorinated compounds. Neither the brand nor widely available product documentation discloses which specific chemistry is used, creating opacity around chemical exposure.

The brand's record and disclosure

Tommy Hilfiger, owned by PVH Corp, has not published a comprehensive PFAS reduction commitment or material transparency standard specific to dress shirts. The brand does not list certifications such as Oeko-Tex Standard 100 or Cradle to Cradle on this product line, which would provide independent verification of chemical limits. No recalls or regulatory actions specific to Tommy Hilfiger wrinkle-resistant apparel have been documented, but the silence on finish chemistry is a disclosure gap rather than a safety guarantee.

How it compares in its category

Most conventional wrinkle-resistant dress shirts (including competitors like Dockers, Brooks Brothers, and mid-market retailers) use similar undisclosed finish technologies. Some premium or sustainability-focused brands (Patagonia, Outdoor Voices) explicitly avoid fluorocarbon finishes or label their chemistry; Tommy Hilfiger does not differentiate this way. Non-wrinkle-resistant cotton dress shirts eliminate this chemical variable entirely but require more frequent pressing, making them less convenient for the target market.

If you buy it

Wash in cool or warm water and tumble-dry on low heat or air-dry; high heat can degrade finish integrity and potentially release volatile compounds. Expect the wrinkle-resistant effect to diminish after 20-30 wash cycles as the finish wears off, which is normal. Avoid chlorine bleach and heavy sizing treatments that can interact with the finish. If concerned about PFAS exposure, contact Tommy Hilfiger directly to request finish composition; lack of response should weigh into future purchases.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Tommy Hilfiger has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Wrinkle-Free Dress Shirts

Men's Slim-Fit Dress Shirt

Banana Republic

Men's Slim-Fit Dress Shirt

Cotton/cotton-blend woven fabric

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower PFAS concern for untreated cotton dress shirt, though brand silence remains.

Risky category by default

Patagonia Men's Farrier's Work Shirt

Patagonia

Men's Farrier's Work Shirt

Organic cotton, standard construction

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower PFAS risk from basic work shirt; no water-resistant coating expected.

Risky category by default

Tommy Hilfiger Men's Dress Shirt Regular Fit

Tommy Hilfiger

Men's Dress Shirt Regular Fit

100% cotton shirting

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower PFAS concern from untreated cotton dress shirt with no performance claims.

Risky category by default

More wrinkle-free dress shirts grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.