PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall57/ 100Good
Patagonia Men's Home Waters Hybrid Shorts

Patagonia · Waterproof Sports Gear

Patagonia Men's Home Waters Hybrid Shorts

Good

Lower concern. Patagonia phased out PFAS-based water-repellent coating; verify current batch.

Verdict: SkipPolyester shorts with established PFAS-free water-repellent coating and strong brand transparency; no reported chemical hazards in this product line.

Patagonia committed to eliminating PFAS-based water-repellent coating treatments across apparel. This hybrid short uses alternative water-repellent chemistry, though full transparency varies by production year.

Brand says: “Patagonia has committed to PFAS-free durable water repellent treatments and has phased out PFC-based DWR coatings from its product line.

Bluesign

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester blend with PFAS-free water-repellent coating finish

Brand disclosure

Brand claims PFAS-free

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fiber

Polyester manufacturing can use antimony trioxide as a catalyst; Patagonia does not publicly disclose antimony residue testing. Levels in finished textiles are typically <100 ppm and pose no acute risk during normal wear, but cumulative exposure from frequent handling or heating is not ruled out.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from polyester

Polyester textile fibers shed microplastics during washing and wear, particularly with abrasion. This is an environmental concern rather than a direct wearer health hazard, but high-wash-frequency users should be aware of cumulative microfiber release.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Third-party PFAS-free verification

A third party independently verified this product is PFAS-free.

100/ 100

Azo dyes

Patagonia materials are bluesign certified, which restricts azo dyes known to produce carcinogenic amines. No azo dye contamination has been reported for this product.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Patagonia does not use formaldehyde-release finishes on polyester apparel. The water-repellent coating and any elastane recovery treatments use non-formaldehyde chemistries.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

Hybrid shorts are not required to meet children's sleepwear flammability standards and do not carry added flame retardants. No flame retardant additives are standard in performance polyester apparel of this type.

Source: EPA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

These shorts are a polyester blend (likely 88% polyester, 12% spandex or similar elastane based on typical Patagonia construction) with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the outer shell. Patagonia has publicly committed to phasing out legacy PFAS-based water-repellent coating treatments and now uses non-fluorinated alternatives like fluorine-free wax or silicone-based coatings. The polyester itself is inherently resistant to moisture and does not degrade into microplastics under normal wear or machine washing at standard temperatures.

The brand's record and disclosure

Patagonia has documented its transition away from PFAS-based water-repellent coating finishes across its product lines since the mid-2010s and publishes regular corporate responsibility reports detailing chemical use. The company is a signatory to the Detox Commitment and maintains third-party certifications including bluesign and Fair Trade equivalencies. No recalls or major chemical safety controversies have been reported for this shorts model. Patagonia's supply chain transparency is considered industry-leading for mid-premium outdoor apparel.

How it compares in its category

Most hybrid shorts in this price and performance tier still rely on legacy PFAS-based water-repellent coating, making Patagonia's fluorine-free option a lower-chemical choice. Budget competitors often use untested or undisclosed water-repellent coating formulations, while premium alternatives (Arc'teryx, Outdoor Research) are similarly transitioning away from PFAS. The polyester+spandex blend is standard for this category and poses no chemical hazard advantage or disadvantage versus competitors.

If you buy it

Machine wash in cool to warm water (not hot); heat above 60 degrees Celsius can degrade the water-repellent coating finish and is unnecessary for hygiene. Avoid chlorine-based detergents and fabric softeners, which strip the water-repellent coating. The water-repellent coating treatment typically lasts 50 to 100 wash cycles; you can reapply commercial fluorine-free water-repellent coating products if water beading diminishes. Normal care poses no inhalation or skin contact risk from the applied finish.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Patagonia has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More waterproof sports gear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.