PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall8/ 100Bad
Quiksilver Men's Legion Cargo 20" Amphibian Hybrid Shorts

Quiksilver · Waterproof Sports Gear

Quiksilver Men's Legion Cargo 20" Amphibian Hybrid Shorts

Bad

Wait for Quiksilver to disclose water-repellent coating chemistry.

Verdict: SkipPolyester blend with undisclosed water-repellent coating poses unknown PFAS risk; no other major hazards on record, but requires transparent chemistry confirmation before full recommendation.

Amphibian hybrid shorts feature water-repellent coating treatment for water repellency, but Quiksilver does not publicly disclose which chemical is used. Many water-repellent coating finishes contain PFAS.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester blend with water-repellent coating water repellent treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fiber

Polyester production sometimes involves antimony as a catalyst; levels in finished apparel are typically low and not considered a skin exposure risk during normal wear, but not independently verified for this product.

70/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Beyond PFAS content, some water-repellent coating chemistry (fluorine-free alternatives) may off-gas volatile organic compounds during initial wear or upon heating. Risk depends on specific formulation, which is not disclosed.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from polyester blend

Polyester textiles shed microfibers during washing; this is an environmental and ingestion concern rather than a direct wearer hazard, but relevant to overall product safety profile.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in polyester

No specific recalls or reports of carcinogenic azo dyes in Quiksilver polyester apparel. Polyester in legitimate brands is typically dyed with non-azo colorants, but batch-level verification is not publicly available for this product.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

water-repellent coating and other fabric finishes can contain formaldehyde as a cross-linking agent, though most modern sportswear brands have reduced or eliminated it. Quiksilver's finish chemistry is undisclosed, so risk cannot be assessed.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

These shorts are polyester blend fabric treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. Polyester itself is chemically stable during normal wear, but the water-repellent coating is the concern: most water-repellent coating treatments historically used PFAS (PFAS "forever chemicals") to achieve water resistance, though some brands have switched to fluorine-free alternatives. Quiksilver has not publicly disclosed which chemistry they use in this product, leaving the actual hazard profile unclear.

The brand's record and disclosure

Quiksilver has no publicly available commitment to PFAS-free water-repellent coating treatments and does not disclose the specific chemistry of water repellent finishes on their product pages or technical documentation. The company has not faced major recalls or controversies specific to water-repellent coating chemistry in these shorts, but the silence on formulation is notable in an industry where competitors increasingly advertise fluorine-free alternatives. This lack of transparency is the primary concern rather than confirmed contamination.

How it compares in its category

Amphibian hybrid shorts from Quiksilver sit in the mid-market segment alongside brands like O'Neill and Billabong, most of which also use water-repellent coating-treated polyester without explicit disclosure. Some premium competitors (e.g., Patagonia, certain Arc'teryx lines) now market fluorine-free water-repellent coating explicitly; budget brands often do the same or skip water-repellent coating altogether. Quiksilver's approach is typical for the sportswear category but increasingly seen as lagging on transparency relative to peers.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water with mild detergent; avoid high-heat drying, which can degrade the water-repellent coating and potentially release volatile compounds. The water-repellent coating treatment will wear off after 20-40 washes, at which point reapplication products (which also vary in chemistry) or replacement becomes necessary. If PFAS exposure is a personal concern, contact Quiksilver directly to request water-repellent coating formulation data before purchase, and consider switching to a competitor with published fluorine-free certification if they do not respond.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Quiksilver has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Sports Gear

Reebok Men's Athlete Speed Shorts

Reebok

Men's Athlete Speed Shorts

Polyester mesh and nylon blend, standard athletic construction

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade47Poor
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Moderate concern

45

Lower concern. Standard athletic shorts without water-resistant coating.

Risky category by default

Patagonia Men's Home Waters Hybrid Shorts

Patagonia

Men's Home Waters Hybrid Shorts

Polyester blend with PFAS-free water-repellent coating finish

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fiber

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from polyester

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Patagonia phased out PFAS-based water-repellent coating; verify current batch.

Bluesign

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

adidas Men's Workout Essentials Base Woven Shorts

Adidas

Men's Workout Essentials Base Woven Shorts

Woven polyester/nylon blend, no waterproof or stain-resistant treatment specified

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade45Poor
🎨

Azo dyes in synthetic textiles

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fiber

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding during washing

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; basic woven shorts without water-repellent coating treatment.

Risky category by default

More waterproof sports gear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.