PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Quiksilver Men's Transit 19 Hybrid Shorts

Quiksilver · Waterproof Sports Gear

Quiksilver Men's Transit 19 Hybrid Shorts

Bad

Hybrid shorts likely use water-repellent coating; Quiksilver discloses nothing about PFAS.

Verdict · SkipPolyester blend with undisclosed water-repellent finish; PFAS likely but unconfirmed. No major hazards on record; manage care to limit treatment degradation.

Quiksilver's Transit shorts are polyester-blend hybrid with unknown water-repellent finish. Brand makes no PFAS statement, raising typical concern for treated apparel.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester blend with water-repellent treatment

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Quiksilver Men's Transit 19 Hybrid Shorts is made of, ingredients and materials

These shorts are polyester blend fabric treated with a water-repellent (water-repellent coating) finish. Polyester itself is stable in normal wear, but the water-repellent coating is almost certainly fluorinated (PFAS-based) given industry standards for hybrid/water-resistant apparel. Quiksilver does not publicly specify the chemistry. The coating degrades with washing and wear, potentially releasing particles or altering over time.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Polyester-blend fabrics may contain antimony oxide as a catalyst residue from fiber production. Levels in finished apparel are typically low and non-bioavailable, but Quiksilver does not disclose testing or limits.

70/ 100
🫧

water-repellent coating degradation and particle release

The water-repellent finish will degrade over the life of the shorts, especially with frequent washing. Small amounts of coating particles may shed into wash water or be inhaled as dust; long-term health impact is uncharacterized for end users.

20/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Azo dyes

No specific azo dye ban or hazard reported in Quiksilver apparel. Polyester dyes are regulated in most manufacturing hubs, though Quiksilver does not certify dye compliance publicly.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Polyester-blend shorts are unlikely to use formaldehyde-releasers for wrinkle resistance given the hybrid/athletic design. No recalls or disclosures suggest this risk.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No specific heavy-metal contamination reported in Quiksilver textiles. Industry regulation and supply-chain oversight in polyester dyeing are moderate in mainstream brands.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Quiksilver has published no public statement on PFAS use in apparel or phasing timelines, placing it in the silent majority of surf/action-sports brands. The company is not known for premium sustainability certifications like Bluesign or GOTS. Industry transparency on water-repellent chemistry is poor across this segment; Quiksilver follows no visible best-practice disclosure.

How it compares in its category

Hybrid shorts with water-repellent coating treatment are industry-standard for performance apparel. Most competitors (Rip Curl, O'Neill, Volcom) use similar undisclosed fluorinated finishes. A small number of brands (e.g.Patagonia for select lines have committed to PFAS alternatives or phaseout timelines. Quiksilver's silence places it in the mainstream unaccountable tier.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water and air-dry to extend the water-repellent coating life; hot water and high heat break down treatment faster. Expect water repellency to fade after 10-20 washes. Do not machine-dry frequently. Polyester itself is durable and not associated with hazards in normal use. Replace when the fit or color degrades, not due to chemical hazard risk.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Quiksilver has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Quiksilver Men's Transit 19 Hybrid Shorts?

  • Woven polyester/nylon blend, no waterproof or stain-resistant treatment specified
  • Heavy metals

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Reebok Men's Athlete Speed Shorts

Reebok

Men's Athlete Speed Shorts

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Polyester mesh and nylon blend, standard athletic construction
  • Formaldehyde / VOCs

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Patagonia Men's Home Waters Hybrid Shorts

Patagonia

Men's Home Waters Hybrid Shorts

45PoorPFAS grade
✓ Bluesign
  • Polyester blend with PFAS-free water-repellent coating finish
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Fragrance or dye allergen sensitivity

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

More waterproof sports gear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.