PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Quiksilver Men's Transit 19 Hybrid Shorts

Quiksilver · Waterproof Sports Gear

Quiksilver Men's Transit 19 Hybrid Shorts

Bad

Hybrid shorts likely use water-repellent coating; Quiksilver discloses nothing about PFAS.

Verdict: SkipPolyester blend with undisclosed water-repellent finish; PFAS likely but unconfirmed. No major hazards on record; manage care to limit treatment degradation.

Quiksilver's Transit shorts are polyester-blend hybrid with unknown water-repellent finish. Brand makes no PFAS statement, raising typical concern for treated apparel.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester blend with water-repellent treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Polyester-blend fabrics may contain antimony oxide as a catalyst residue from fiber production. Levels in finished apparel are typically low and non-bioavailable, but Quiksilver does not disclose testing or limits.

70/ 100
🫧

water-repellent coating degradation and particle release

The water-repellent finish will degrade over the life of the shorts, especially with frequent washing. Small amounts of coating particles may shed into wash water or be inhaled as dust; long-term health impact is uncharacterized for end users.

20/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes

No specific azo dye ban or hazard reported in Quiksilver apparel. Polyester dyes are regulated in most manufacturing hubs, though Quiksilver does not certify dye compliance publicly.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Polyester-blend shorts are unlikely to use formaldehyde-releasers for wrinkle resistance given the hybrid/athletic design. No recalls or disclosures suggest this risk.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No specific heavy-metal contamination reported in Quiksilver textiles. Industry regulation and supply-chain oversight in polyester dyeing are moderate in mainstream brands.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

These shorts are polyester blend fabric treated with a water-repellent (water-repellent coating) finish. Polyester itself is stable in normal wear, but the water-repellent coating is almost certainly fluorinated (PFAS-based) given industry standards for hybrid/water-resistant apparel. Quiksilver does not publicly specify the chemistry. The coating degrades with washing and wear, potentially releasing particles or altering over time.

The brand's record and disclosure

Quiksilver has published no public statement on PFAS use in apparel or phasing timelines, placing it in the silent majority of surf/action-sports brands. The company is not known for premium sustainability certifications like Bluesign or GOTS. Industry transparency on water-repellent chemistry is poor across this segment; Quiksilver follows no visible best-practice disclosure.

How it compares in its category

Hybrid shorts with water-repellent coating treatment are industry-standard for performance apparel. Most competitors (Rip Curl, O'Neill, Volcom) use similar undisclosed fluorinated finishes. A small number of brands (e.g., Patagonia for select lines) have committed to PFAS-free alternatives or phaseout timelines. Quiksilver's silence places it in the mainstream unaccountable tier.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water and air-dry to extend the water-repellent coating life; hot water and high heat break down treatment faster. Expect water repellency to fade after 10-20 washes. Do not machine-dry frequently. Polyester itself is durable and safe in normal use. Replace when the fit or color degrades, not due to chemical hazard risk.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Quiksilver has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Sports Gear

Reebok Men's Athlete Speed Shorts

Reebok

Men's Athlete Speed Shorts

Polyester mesh and nylon blend, standard athletic construction

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade47Poor
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Moderate concern

45

Lower concern. Standard athletic shorts without water-resistant coating.

Risky category by default

Patagonia Men's Home Waters Hybrid Shorts

Patagonia

Men's Home Waters Hybrid Shorts

Polyester blend with PFAS-free water-repellent coating finish

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fiber

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from polyester

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Patagonia phased out PFAS-based water-repellent coating; verify current batch.

Bluesign

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

adidas Men's Workout Essentials Base Woven Shorts

Adidas

Men's Workout Essentials Base Woven Shorts

Woven polyester/nylon blend, no waterproof or stain-resistant treatment specified

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade45Poor
🎨

Azo dyes in synthetic textiles

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fiber

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding during washing

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; basic woven shorts without water-repellent coating treatment.

Risky category by default

More waterproof sports gear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.