Puma Japan Golf Glove Fusion 2023 For Left Hand 867912 White Black
Golf glove with hidden water-resistant coating and no Puma PFAS clarity.
This leather-synthetic blend gets water-resistant treatment of unknown composition. Puma shares no details about materials, coatings, or PFAS.
The better-graded swap
Wilson
Wilson Duo Soft Golf Balls
85/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Leather/synthetic with unspecified water-resistant treatment
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Puma Japan Golf Glove Fusion White Black is made of, ingredients and materials
The Puma Fusion 2023 combines leather (likely goat or synthetic leather) with synthetic overlays, bound together with adhesives and finished with an unspecified water-resistant treatment. Water-resistant coatings on textiles are frequently PFAS-based (perfluorooctane or similar), which persist in the product and your skin during use. Puma has not publicly disclosed the chemical identity of this treatment, leaving the composition opaque. The glove's durability depends on how the coating and leather interact over repeated use and washing cycles.
What’s concerning
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
PFAS
Undisclosed fluorochemical or polyurethane-based coating likely present; identity not confirmed by Puma. Potential for skin sensitization during use if coating degrades and sheds particles.
Source, ATSDR ↗Coating durability and shedding with use
Water-resistant coatings on golf gloves are subject to wear from friction, moisture, and sweat. Degradation over time may release coating fragments or volatile compounds, though acute health risk is low in an outdoor, hand-worn application.
What’s reassuring
Adhesive leachables (leather-to-synthetic bonding)
No specific recalls or complaints on record for this model. Standard leather glove adhesives are generally low-risk, but manufacturing details are not disclosed.
Synthetic leather material toxicity
If polyvinyl chloride (PVC)-based, may contain phthalate plasticizers; if polyurethane-based, generally considered low-risk. Puma does not specify the synthetic leather chemistry for this product.
Heavy metals
No recalls or test reports available for this glove. Leather and synthetic leather typically undergo standard colorant screening, but independent verification is absent.
Source, FDA ↗How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Puma has not published a clear stance on PFAS use in textiles or sports equipment, nor has it committed to phase-out timelines that rival brands (Adidas, Nike) have begun to adopt. The company does not publicly list restricted substance lists (RSLs) specific to golf products. No major safety recalls or hazardous chemical recalls for this glove model are on public record, but the lack of transparency on water-resistant chemistry is notable in an industry moving toward disclosure.
How it compares in its category
Golf gloves occupy a narrow niche with limited third-party testing data. Most competitors (Callaway, TaylorMade, FootJoy) also use undisclosed water-resistant finishes; this product is typical, not exceptional. Some premium brands (e.g., Ping) advertise PFAS-free or explicitly PFOA-free treatments, setting a higher transparency bar. The Puma Fusion 2023 offers no such assurance, placing it in the middle-to-low transparency tier for the category.
If you buy it
Wash the glove in cool water before first use to rinse loose finishes. Avoid machine washing or heat drying, as these degrade the coating and may leach treatment chemicals. Inspect the glove monthly for peeling, cracking, or separation at seams; replace if the water-resistant coating visibly deteriorates, as this signals end of product life. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to extend the leather's lifespan and minimize off-gassing of residual treatment chemicals.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Puma has made a specific claim
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Puma Japan Golf Glove Fusion 2023 For Left Hand 867912 White Black?
- Steel clubheads, graphite shafts, rubber grips
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Graphite shaft resin degradation and fiber exposure
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- Cabretta leather, likely tannin-tanned
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- leather or synthetic leather with cotton lining
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonMore golf balls & equipment grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.