PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Mascara Revlon So Big Bad Lash

Revlon · Waterproof Mascara

Mascara Revlon So Big Bad Lash

Poor

Waterproof cosmetic with unknown polymer composition, limited disclosure.

Verdict: SkipWater-resistant mascara with poor PFAS disclosure and unknown polymer binders; acceptable if replaced every 3 months and not applied near eyes daily.

Revlon has not disclosed PFAS status or ingredient details for this waterproof mascara. No third-party testing or certification available to assess risk.

The safe swap

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Burt's Bees

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Water-resistant mascara formula with waxes and polymers

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (solvent contaminant)

Water-resistant mascara formulas often use ethoxylated polymers or emulsifiers as manufacturing byproducts; 1,4-dioxane is a known impurity in these ingredients. Revlon does not publish testing data for this contaminant in mascara, but the risk exists at trace levels in water-resistant cosmetics industry-wide.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Waterproof mascara requires robust antimicrobial systems due to high water content and wax environment favorable to fungal growth. Revlon's ingredient list does not disclose specific preservatives; formaldehyde releasers (imidazolidinyl urea, dmdm hydantoin) are common in this product category and may be present.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from polymers

Water-resistant mascaras are documented sources of microplastic fibers during removal and application. The undisclosed polymer binders in this product may shed tiny particles when rubbed or removed, particularly if the mascara tube is old or the product has dried. This is a known property of the mascara category, not specific contamination.

45/ 100
⚠️

Eye irritation from polymer or preservative residue

Approximately 5-10% of regular mascara users report irritation; water-resistant formulas increase this risk due to higher polymer concentration and potential for incomplete removal. Revlon So Big Bad Lash carries standard cosmetic irritation risk, especially for sensitive eyes or contact lens wearers who do not remove the product thoroughly.

20/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or test data link Revlon So Big Bad Lash to lead, cadmium, or arsenic contamination. Iron oxide and synthetic mica pigments used in mascaras are generally low-risk if from certified suppliers, though third-party testing is rare for mascara pigments.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Revlon So Big Bad Lash is a water-resistant mascara based on waxes (likely carnauba or synthetic), film-forming polymers, and thickeners suspended in water. The 'waterproof' claim typically relies on silicone or acrylic polymers and hydrophobic waxes that create a barrier. Water-resistant formulas require more aggressive binders and fewer water-soluble ingredients, which increases reliance on synthetic polymers of undisclosed composition. The exact polymer identity is not published by Revlon, making independent assessment of microplastic risk or volatile off-gases difficult.

The brand's record and disclosure

Revlon does not publish full ingredient sourcing or polymer composition for waterproof mascaras. The brand has faced no major recalls or contamination scandals specific to this product line, but maintains limited transparency on PFAS use in water-resistant cosmetics across its portfolio. Revlon holds no third-party safety certifications (such as EWG certification or vegan/clean beauty seals) for this mascara. The brand's parent company (now owned by KKR following 2022 restructuring) has not issued public commitments to eliminate PFAS from cosmetics.

How it compares in its category

Water-resistant mascaras inherently carry higher PFAS and synthetic polymer loading than non-waterproof alternatives. Revlon So Big Bad Lash is mid-tier in this category: it lacks the premium disclosure of brands like Clinique or MAC (which provide more detailed polymer information) but is more mainstream than niche indie brands that often use wax-only formulas. Typical non-waterproof mascaras from competitors (e.g., Maybelline Lash Sensational, L'Oreal Voluminous) have fewer water-repellent polymers and thus lower PFAS potential, though they sacrifice durability.

If you buy it

Replace every 3 months or sooner if product dries out, as expired mascara becomes a bacterial reservoir and loses pigment stability. Apply only to lashes, never to the waterline or inner lid, to minimize eye irritation and polymer contact with mucous membranes. Do not heat (e.g., with blow dryer) or microwave the product, as wax and polymer degradation under heat may release volatile compounds. Remove nightly with non-abrasive micellar water or oil cleanser to prevent polymer buildup and eye inflammation.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Revlon has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Mascara

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Burt's Bees

100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Wax, pigments, natural oils (typical mascara base)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade67Good
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed sensitizers

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial growth and contamination in wax formula

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; conventional non-waterproof formula with no identified PFAS drivers.

Risky category by default

More waterproof mascara grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.