Rimmel London Scandaleyes Mascara with Waterproof Kohl Kajal Liner
Skip until brand discloses waterproof treatment chemistry.
Waterproof mascara and kohl liner likely contain water-repellent coatings, but Rimmel provides no ingredient transparency or PFAS disclosure. Unknown treatment chemicals prevent confident assessment.
The better-graded swap
Burt's Bees
Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown
75/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
pigments, waxes, polymers, waterproofing treatment unspecified
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Rimmel London Scandaleyes Kohl Kajal Liner is made of, ingredients and materials
Rimmel Scandaleyes mascara is a dual product combining mascara (pigments, waxes, film-forming polymers) with a waterproof kohl kajal liner. The waterproofing mechanism is not publicly specified by the brand, which is the core concern, waterproof cosmetics often rely on Teflon-type coating, silicones, or fluorinated compounds to repel water, but Rimmel has not disclosed which approach is used here. Waxes and polymers themselves (carnauba, paraffin, acrylates) are low-hazard, but the waterproof additive identity matters.
What’s concerning
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components
Mascara and kajal products often contain fragrance; Rimmel does not break down 'fragrance' into component allergens. Individuals with sensitive eyes or contact lens use may react to fragrance compounds, especially near the eye.
PFAS
Waterproof eye products frequently use Teflon-type coating (Teflon), siloxanes, or fluorinated compounds. Rimmel's silence on the waterproofing treatment is the primary hazard; eye area exposure to airborne particles or microplastics from degraded coating is a plausible pathway.
Source, ATSDR ↗Microplastics
Kohl liners are prone to flaking and particle shedding over time, especially if formulation uses low-cost synthetic waxes or polymers. No specific test results on this product, but the eye area is sensitive to foreign particles.
Source, EPA ↗What’s reassuring
Heavy metals
No recalls or established contamination reported for Rimmel mascaras. Iron oxides and titanium dioxide are widely used colorants in cosmetics and are not banned; however, sourcing quality is brand-dependent and Rimmel does not publish supplier audits.
Source, FDA ↗Formaldehyde / VOCs
Rimmel does not disclose use of formaldehyde-releasing preservatives such as DMDM hydantoin or imidazolidinyl urea in published ingredient lists for this product. No recalls on record, but ingredient transparency would confirm absence.
Source, ATSDR ↗How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Rimmel (owned by Coty) has a poor track record of ingredient transparency and has not published a PFAS policy or waterproof treatment disclosure. No major cosmetic-specific contamination recalls for this exact product line are on record, but the brand's silence on PFAS and waterproofing chemistry is a significant red flag in an industry where competitors increasingly publish such details. Rimmel does not list certifications such as EWG Verified or cruelty-free seals prominently.
How it compares in its category
Waterproof mascaras and liners are a high-category concern for PFAS because water resistance typically requires fluorine chemistry; many mainstream brands (Maybelline, L'Oreal) also remain opaque on this. Some alternatives (e.g., Pacifica, Burt's Bees) disclose non-fluorinated waterproofing or omit it entirely, trading longevity for transparency. Rimmel sits in the opaque mainstream segment, offering low cost but minimal accountability.
If you buy it
Apply sparingly to avoid excess product accumulation near the eye area, where skin absorption is higher. Replace every 3 months or sooner if the formula dries out or separates, as older formulas may shed particles. Remove with a dedicated makeup remover rather than harsh rubbing; waterproof formulas can degrade quickly under friction. Until Rimmel discloses waterproof chemistry, consider this a temporary choice rather than a regular staple.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Rimmel has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Rimmel London Scandaleyes Mascara with Waterproof Kohl Kajal Liner?
- Wax, pigments, natural oils (typical mascara base)
- Fragrance allergens and undisclosed sensitizers
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- pigments, waxes, polymers (unspecified)
- Lead
5 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon- pigments, waxes, film-formers in liquid mascara
- Heavy metals
5 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonMore waterproof mascara grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.