PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall7/ 100Bad
Grease-Resistant Paper Wraps And Liners

· Grease-Resistant Butcher & Deli Paper

Grease-Resistant Paper Wraps And Liners

Poor

Avoid until the brand discloses coating chemistry and PFAS facts.

Verdict: SkipPFAS coating composition undisclosed, brand silent on safety, grease-resistant food contact paper carries known fluorochemical risk unverified here.

Grease-resistant paper liners typically get their slick surface from fluorinated coatings. This brand says nothing about PFAS, coating type, or any third-party verification.

The safe swap

Member's Mark Heavy Duty Food Service Foil

Sam's Club

Member's Mark Heavy Duty Food Service Foil

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

paper with grease-resistant coating, composition unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Grease-resistant food contact papers commonly rely on perfluorinated or polyfluorinated compounds to repel oils. Safeseal has not disclosed whether this product contains PFAS; absence of disclosure in a product class where PFAS is routine constitutes unquantified risk of bioaccumulative contaminant migration into food.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🍳

Coating migration and leaching under heat or food contact

The unspecified coating may leach into food, particularly when in contact with hot, fatty, or acidic foods. Without published migration data or FDA compliance documentation, the extent and safety of any leaching cannot be assessed.

70/ 100
🏷️

Inadequate product labeling and ingredient transparency

The brand provides no ingredient list, safety data sheet, or third-party testing results publicly available. This is non-compliant with best practice in food contact materials and prevents informed consumer choice.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Thermal stability of coating formulation

No published data on degradation temperature, off-gassing, or breakdown byproducts under cooking conditions are available. Use above stated temperature limits poses unknown risk.

95/ 100

Microplastic or particulate shedding

Paper-based food wraps occasionally shed fibers or coating particles when handled; no specific testing data for Safeseal product is available to quantify this risk.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Safeseal grease-resistant paper wraps use a coating formulation that the brand has not publicly specified. Grease-resistant food contact papers typically rely on fluorinated compounds (PFAS) or non-fluorinated wax/silicone blends; without disclosure, the chemistry cannot be assessed. The substrate itself is cellulose fiber, which is low-risk, but the coating's composition and migration potential under heat or food contact are the critical safety unknowns here.

The brand's record and disclosure

Safeseal has not publicly disclosed the chemical composition of this product's grease-resistant coating or its PFAS status. No third-party certifications (e.g., FDA pre-market approvals, NSF, or independent chemical audits) are on record for this specific product line. The brand's silence on a hazard class routinely present in this product category is a material red flag in food packaging.

How it compares in its category

Grease-resistant food wraps are a high-risk category for PFAS because fluorochemicals are cost-effective and durable for this purpose. Major suppliers (e.g., Huhtamaki, Apio, some Costco house brands) have begun disclosing PFAS-free alternatives or phasing fluorochemicals out. Safeseal's lack of any public commitment or alternative product line positions it below transparent competitors in the category.

If you buy it

Do not use at temperatures above 350F without manufacturer guidance, as coating degradation can accelerate leaching. Keep contact time with high-fat foods (oils, cheese, meat) as brief as possible to limit migration. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct light. Do not microwave or use in ovens without written confirmation the coating is heat-stable and PFAS-free.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Grease-Resistant Butcher & Deli Paper

Member's Mark Heavy Duty Food Service Foil

Sam's Club

Member's Mark Heavy Duty Food Service Foil

Aluminum foil

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade66Good
🔩

Aluminum leaching from acidic foods

Limited concern

70

Lower risk. Plain aluminum foil typically does not contain PFAS.

Risky category by default

Idl Packaging White Butcher Paper 18" x 12000" Natural Butcher Paper Roll for Meat and Fish

Sam's Club

Idl Packaging White Butcher Paper 18" x 12000" Natural Butcher Paper Roll for Meat and Fish

unbleached natural kraft paper

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade66Good
⚠️

Grease and mineral oil migration

Limited concern

70

Lower risk. Uncoated paper rarely contains PFAS chemicals.

Risky category by default

IDL Packaging PFAS-Free Grease-Proof Paper Sheets

IDL Packaging PFAS-Free Grease-Proof Paper Sheets

paper with grease-resistant coating

PFAS Grade50Good
Overall Grade42Poor
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from coating under wear

Limited concern

70

Brand claims PFAS-free but lacks independent lab verification.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More grease-resistant butcher & deli paper grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.