PFAS50/ 100Good
Overall46/ 100Poor
Freewell CPL Circular Polarizer Filter for Samsung Galaxy Ultra

Samsung · Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

Freewell CPL Circular Polarizer Filter for Samsung Galaxy Ultra

Good

Camera filters typically have optical coatings; PFAS risk unclear without disclosure.

Verdict · SkipOptical glass filter with minimal established hazards; no brand disclosure issues reported for this accessory category.

Freewell CPL filters are optical glass with anti-reflective coatings, but the brand provides no PFAS information. Optical coatings composition remains undisclosed to consumers.

The better-graded swap

Tiffen Photo Twin Pack

Tiffen

Tiffen Photo Twin Pack

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Glass optical filter lens with unspecified coatings

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

A coating is recorded with no disclosed chemistry.

75/ 100
🍳

Optical coating composition and leaching

Anti-reflective and hydrophobic coatings on the glass are not disclosed by Freewell. While optical coatings are generally stable under normal camera use (no heat, no moisture contact), coating integrity is not independently verified, and potential trace heavy metals or fluorine compounds in coatings remain unassessed.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Thermal stability of coatings

Camera lens filters are not exposed to cooking temperatures or sustained heat. No established risk of coating degradation or off-gassing under typical smartphone photography use. Risk would only emerge if filter were deliberately heated or misused.

95/ 100

Microparticles from coating wear

Optical coatings can degrade through abrasion and age, potentially shedding microscopic particles. However, these particles would remain on the exterior lens surface or inside the protective case, not entering the body or environment in meaningful quantities during normal use.

95/ 100

Glass integrity and breakage hazard

The filter is made of optical glass, which is inert but can shatter if dropped. Broken glass poses a physical cutting hazard only; no chemical risk from the glass itself. Freewell does not publish impact-resistance or breakage safety data.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This is a circular polarizer filter made of optical glass with anti-reflective and possibly hydrophobic coatings applied to the lens surfaces. The glass itself is not a material linked to PFAS; the coatings are the material of concern. Freewell does not publicly disclose the specific composition of these optical coatings, which typically include silicon dioxide, titanium dioxide, or fluorine-based compounds for durability and light transmission. No independent testing of this specific filter for leaching or coating integrity under normal use has been published.

The brand's record and disclosure

Freewell is a third-party camera accessory maker, not the phone manufacturer; Samsung does not manufacture this filter. Freewell has not issued public transparency statements on chemical composition, heavy metals, or PFAS use in their optical coatings. No safety recalls, certifications (ISO, RoHS), or testing disclosures for this product line have been established in public records. The brand's general safety posture for camera accessories remains undocumented.

How it compares in its category

Circular polarizer filters are among the lowest-risk camera accessories because they are never heated, ingested, or worn against skin, and exposure is limited to holding and brief optical contact with a lens. Most competing filters (Neewer, K&F Concept, generic glass polarizers) share similar construction and lack public composition data, making this product typical rather than exceptional. The main differentiation would be optical quality and hydrophobic coating durability, not chemical safety.

If you buy it

Store the filter in its protective case to prevent dust and scratch accumulation, which can degrade coatings and optical performance over time. Do not expose the filter to extreme heat (above 60°C / 140°F) or direct prolonged sunlight when not in use, as thermal stress can affect coating adhesion. Clean only with a soft microfiber cloth and lens-safe solution; avoid harsh solvents. Replace if the coating visibly flakes, darkens, or loses hydrophobic properties, which typically occurs after 2-5 years of regular use.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 62% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Samsung has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3

Think Tank Photo

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3

Ballistic nylon, weather-sealed fabric, metal hardware

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
🏷️

Undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70

Camera holster with weather treatment; PFAS status undisclosed.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nikon WP-CP3 Marine Case for Camera

Nikon

WP-CP3 Marine Case for Camera

Polycarbonate/rubber with waterproof seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade73Good

Polycarbonate degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Rubber gasket hardening and seal failure

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth in sealed moisture pockets

Limited concern

70

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nikon WP-N1 Waterproof Housing

Nikon

WP-N1 Waterproof Housing

Polycarbonate housing with waterproof seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade77Excellent

Gasket material degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Polycarbonate microcracking or crazing

Limited concern

70

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof camera & lens protection cases grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.