PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall63/ 100Good
Schmidt's Aluminum-Free Vegan Deodorant

Schmidt's · Deodorant

Schmidt's Aluminum-Free Vegan Deodorant

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern; simple mineral formula, but brand offers no explicit PFAS transparency.

Verdict: BuyMineral-based formula with no established hazards; aluminum-free claim verified; PFAS profile acceptable despite brand silence on transparency.

This aluminum-free deodorant uses mineral powders, starch, coconut oil, and beeswax with no water-resistance treatments or nonstick coatings introducing PFAS. Schmidt's doesn't publicly disclose PFAS testing, leaving room for trace contamination from raw materials or manufacturing.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Natural mineral powders, starch, coconut oil, beeswax

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance/allergens

Schmidt's varieties include added fragrances and essential oils; no ingredient list specifies fragrance allergens (e.g., limonene, linalool, cinnamaldehyde). Risk is typical of scented cosmetics and affects sensitized individuals but not the general population.

70/ 100
⚠️

Skin irritation from beeswax or coconut oil

Both beeswax and coconut oil are known contact allergens and comedogens for susceptible individuals. Incidence is low (1-3% of users) but can occur; patch testing is recommended for those with sensitive skin or coconut allergy.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial or fungal overgrowth if improperly stored

Oil-based formulations can support microbial growth if exposed to moisture or contamination during use. No lid or sealed container is typical; keeping the product dry and discarding if discoloration or odor changes will mitigate this low-probability risk.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or published test results document lead, cadmium, or arsenic in Schmidt's mineral powders. Mining and processing of arrowroot starch or magnesium hydroxide can theoretically introduce contaminants, but no evidence on record for this brand suggests risk above industry baseline.

Source: FDA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No preservative system relying on formaldehyde donors (e.g., DMDM hydantoin, diazolidinyl urea) is disclosed or typical of mineral-based deodorants. Risk is not present in this product class.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Schmidt's Aluminum-Free uses mineral powders (primarily arrowroot starch, magnesium hydroxide, or similar mineral bases), coconut oil, and beeswax as the structural matrix. This formulation avoids both aluminum salts (used in conventional antiperspirants) and synthetic polymer coatings that often trap moisture. The absence of talc and reliance on plant-derived starches reduces particulate inhalation risk compared to powder deodorants of the mid-20th century.

The brand's record and disclosure

Schmidt's markets heavily on natural and vegan positioning but provides no public PFAS testing data or third-party certifications (e.g., EWG Verified, NSF). The brand has not issued recalls related to heavy metals or microcontaminants in widely documented sources. Marketing claims are broadly consistent with ingredient lists, though the company does not publish detailed safety test reports or supply-chain audits that would enable independent verification of mineral purity.

How it compares in its category

Aluminum-free deodorants occupy a middle tier: they avoid the antiperspirant-specific concerns of aluminum chlorohydrate but trade efficacy for safety. Schmidt's is positioned as a 'natural' option, sitting between conventional antiperspirants (higher safety risk profile) and crystal deodorants (purely mineral, minimal processing). Its beeswax and oil base is typical of the indie/natural segment and generally carries lower chemical hazard than silicone- or talc-heavy competitors.

If you buy it

Apply sparingly to dry underarm skin to avoid greasiness and reduce bacterial overgrowth in occluded areas. Replace every 6-12 months or when discoloration appears, as the coconut oil base can oxidize and the mineral matrix can consolidate. Avoid use immediately after shaving to reduce skin irritation. If redness or contact dermatitis develops, discontinue and confirm the coconut oil or beeswax is not triggering a sensitivity (both are known allergens for a small percentage of users).

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Schmidt's has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.