PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall23/ 100Bad
Schwarzkopf OSiS+ Freeze Finish 2 Hairspray

Schwarzkopf · Hair Spray

Schwarzkopf OSiS+ Freeze Finish 2 Hairspray

Good

Avoid until Schwarzkopf reveals PFAS status; hairspray formulations often contain fluorinated silicones.

Verdict: SkipPFAS status undisclosed and likely present in fluorinated silicone resins; standard hairspray toxicity profile manageable with ventilation.

Schwarzkopf makes no public PFAS disclosure for this aerosolized product. Aerosol hairsprays commonly use fluorinated polymer additives for hold and water resistance, though specifics remain unknown.

The safe swap

Bumble and Bumble Thickening Spray

Bumble and bumble

Bumble and Bumble Thickening Spray

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

aerosolized polymeric resins and propellants

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Inhalation of aerosolized polymeric resins and propellants

Aerosol hairsprays are known to deposit fine particles in the respiratory tract; occupational exposure in salons is well documented. OSiS+ Freeze Finish 2's polymer and propellant blend will follow this pattern; individual sensitivity varies.

45/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Professional freeze sprays commonly use fluorinated silicones for water repellency. Schwarzkopf has not disclosed PFAS-free reformulation; the product likely contains Teflon-type coating or similar fluorinated polymers at typical hairspray concentrations, though absolute levels are unknown.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in propellants and solvents

Hairsprays routinely contain hydrocarbons and alcohol propellants classified as VOCs. Acute symptoms (headache, dizziness) are possible during or immediately after use in enclosed spaces; no specific toxicity data for this formulation exists on record.

45/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergen content (undisclosed)

Professional hairsprays often include synthetic fragrance blends; Schwarzkopf does not itemize these on the label. Individuals with fragrance sensitivity or contact dermatitis may react to airborne or residual fragrance compounds.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Aerosol formulations typically do not require aqueous preservatives; no evidence of formaldehyde-donors in hairspray category products. This hazard is not a concern for this format.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

OSiS+ Freeze Finish 2 is an aerosol hairspray based on polymeric resins (likely acrylates or silicone-based) suspended in propellant gases. The product likely contains fluorinated silicone compounds to achieve water and humidity resistance, which is standard in professional-grade freeze sprays but introduces PFAS exposure during application and in residual particles. Aerosol delivery means inhalation risk is inherent to the format, not unique to this brand.

The brand's record and disclosure

Schwarzkopf (Henkel subsidiary) has not publicly disclosed PFAS content or reformulation efforts specific to hairsprays, despite growing industry pressure. The brand holds multiple certifications (e.g., dermatological testing) but these do not address volatile organic compound (VOC) or PFAS disclosure. No recalls or established safety violations on record for this specific product, though hairspray category as a whole carries routine inhalation exposure concerns.

How it compares in its category

Professional hairsprays typically contain silicone-based or fluorinated polymers for durability; OSiS+ sits at the higher-performance end of the market. Many mass-market alternatives use simpler acrylate resins with fewer PFAS indicators, though Schwarzkopf's formulation is not notably worse than competitors at its price point. Brands explicitly PFAS-free or VOC-reduced (e.g., some indie aerosols) exist but may sacrifice hold strength.

If you buy it

Always apply in well-ventilated spaces; avoid inhalation of mist, especially during long styling sessions. Store away from heat sources; propellant cans are pressure vessels. Replace when the spray pattern weakens or sputters, indicating propellant depletion. Do not use on damp hair in poorly ventilated rooms, as this increases both aerosol inhalation and the residence time of PFAS-containing particles.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Schwarzkopf has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Hair Spray

Moroccanoil Treatment Mist

Moroccanoil

Treatment Mist

argan oil, silicones, water-based spray emulsion

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade53Good
🏷️

Fragrance allergens / undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70

Silicone buildup on hair over time

Moderate concern

45
💨

Inhalation exposure from spray format

Limited concern

70
🧼

Preservative sensitivity (paraben or alt. preservative not itemized)

Limited concern

70

Low concern for PFAS; oil-based cosmetic spray contains no obvious fluorinated additives.

Risky category by default

Bumble and Bumble Thickening Spray

Bumble and bumble

Thickening Spray

spray formulation (polymers, propellant, solvents)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade63Good
⚠️

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from solvents

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Propellant-related respiratory irritation

Limited concern

70

Low concern; spray styling product shows no known PFAS triggers, though chemical composition remains undisclosed.

Risky category by default

Wella EIMI Ocean Spritz

Wella

EIMI Ocean Spritz

Water-based spray propellant with conditioning polymers

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade63Good
💨

Inhalation of aerosolized propellant and polymers

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and contact sensitization

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Polymer film buildup and scalp irritation with overuse

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for typical spray cosmetic, but Wella discloses nothing about PFAS.

Risky category by default

More hair spray grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.