PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall39/ 100Poor
Wella EIMI Stay Firm Workable Finishing Hairspray

Wella · Hair Spray

Wella EIMI Stay Firm Workable Finishing Hairspray

Good

Avoid until Wella discloses or third-party testing confirms safety.

Verdict: SkipTypical aerosol hairspray with unconfirmed PFAS status; acceptable if used as directed with good ventilation, but Wella's silence on PFAS warrants caution.

Wella offers no public PFAS disclosure or third-party verification for this aerosol. Hairsprays historically carry PFAS risk from water/stain repellency claims and aerosol formulations, though this product's specific ingredients are untested.

The safe swap

Bumble and Bumble Thickening Spray

Bumble and bumble

Bumble and Bumble Thickening Spray

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

aerosol hairspray (alcohol, resins, propellant)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Propellant inhalation (hydrocarbon or LPG)

Aerosol hairsprays release volatile propellants during and after application. Acute inhalation in poor ventilation may cause dizziness or respiratory irritation; chronic exposure risk is low for typical consumer use but cumulative in salons or frequent heavy users.

70/ 100
💨

Resin particle inhalation

Acrylate or acrylic resin polymers form fine particles in aerosol clouds; long-term lung effects at consumer exposure levels are not well-studied, though occupational exposure to aerosol resins is monitored in salon settings.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergen exposure

Hairsprays typically contain undisclosed fragrance compounds; individuals with fragrance sensitivity may experience scalp irritation, headache, or respiratory sensitivity from inhalation or residue contact.

70/ 100
⚠️

Eye and mucous membrane irritation

Aerosol spray contact with eyes or mouth causes acute irritation. Product labeling warns against direct facial spray; accidental exposure during application in windy conditions or in bathrooms is a known consumer hazard.

45/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Wella does not disclose PFAS use; industry testing has found PFAS in some aerosol hairsprays as anti-static or water-repellent additives. Third-party data for this specific product is absent; Wella's silence is the primary concern.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Wella EIMI Stay Firm is an alcohol-based aerosol hairspray containing film-forming resins (likely acrylate polymers) and a hydrocarbon or liquefied petroleum gas propellant. The alcohol carrier evaporates quickly, leaving resin particles suspended in hair; propellants and aerosol delivery carry inhalation risk if used in unventilated spaces. This is a functional category where ingredient transparency is limited by industry practice, making independent verification difficult.

The brand's record and disclosure

Wella (owned by Coty Inc.) does not publicly disclose PFAS use in hairsprays or commitment to phase-out, despite growing industry awareness. The brand has no major published safety recalls for this specific product line. Wella does not list detailed ingredient breakdowns beyond FDA cosmetic labeling standards, limiting consumer verification of chemical content beyond what aerosol hairsprays typically contain.

How it compares in its category

Standard alcohol-based aerosol hairsprays like Wella's carry similar inhalation and propellant risks as competitors (Tresemmé, TRESemmé, drugstore brands). Pump-spray and non-aerosol alternatives eliminate propellant concerns but may offer less firm hold. Brands with explicit PFAS-free claims or third-party certifications (e.g., EWG Verified) are available in the same price range, offering more transparency.

If you buy it

Use only in well-ventilated spaces to minimize inhalation of propellant and fine resin particles; avoid spraying near face if possible. Do not use in unventilated bathrooms or cars for extended periods. Replace when propellant pressure drops noticeably. If respiratory sensitivity, allergies, or pregnancy are factors, opt for pump-spray or non-aerosol finishers pending Wella's PFAS disclosure.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Wella has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Hair Spray

Moroccanoil Treatment Mist

Moroccanoil

Treatment Mist

argan oil, silicones, water-based spray emulsion

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade53Good
🏷️

Fragrance allergens / undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70

Silicone buildup on hair over time

Moderate concern

45
💨

Inhalation exposure from spray format

Limited concern

70
🧼

Preservative sensitivity (paraben or alt. preservative not itemized)

Limited concern

70

Low concern for PFAS; oil-based cosmetic spray contains no obvious fluorinated additives.

Risky category by default

Bumble and Bumble Thickening Spray

Bumble and bumble

Thickening Spray

spray formulation (polymers, propellant, solvents)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade63Good
⚠️

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from solvents

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Propellant-related respiratory irritation

Limited concern

70

Low concern; spray styling product shows no known PFAS triggers, though chemical composition remains undisclosed.

Risky category by default

Wella EIMI Ocean Spritz

Wella

EIMI Ocean Spritz

Water-based spray propellant with conditioning polymers

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade63Good
💨

Inhalation of aerosolized propellant and polymers

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and contact sensitization

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Polymer film buildup and scalp irritation with overuse

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for typical spray cosmetic, but Wella discloses nothing about PFAS.

Risky category by default

More hair spray grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.