PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall43/ 100Poor
Secret Outlast Invisible Solid Antiperspirant/Deodorant

Secret · Deodorant

Secret Outlast Invisible Solid Antiperspirant/Deodorant

Good

Wait for Secret's PFAS disclosure or third-party testing before buying.

Verdict: SkipModerate PFAS concern unresolved by brand; standard deodorant hazards minimal but fragrance allergen risk present. Wait for disclosure or switch.

Secret Outlast doesn't publicly address PFAS in this product. Long-lasting and invisible deodorant sticks frequently use PFAS for sweat and water resistance, making this a moderate concern without independent testing or brand transparency.

The safe swap

Sustainable Plastic-Free Deodorant

Puracy

Sustainable Plastic-Free Deodorant

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Stick composite (wax, starch, fragrance base)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and contact sensitization

Secret Outlast lists 'fragrance' as a single ingredient without component disclosure, standard industry practice. Fragrance blends in stick deodorants commonly contain limonene, linalool, and eugenol, which are known contact allergens; incidence in the general population is 1-3%, higher in atopic individuals.

70/ 100
🔩

Aluminum absorption via skin

Antiperspirant aluminum salts (likely aluminum chlorohydrate or zirconium at 15-25% w/w) penetrate the stratum corneum under occlusion. Systemic absorption is low but detectable; long-term daily use raises cumulative exposure. No causative link to Alzheimer's is established, but vulnerable populations (kidney disease, frequent users) warrant monitoring and dermatologist clearance.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance-related respiratory or skin irritation in sensitive groups

Anecdotal user reports on beauty forums describe underarm irritation or mild respiratory sensitivity to scent intensity in Secret formulations. Not a widespread adverse event, but fragrance-sensitive consumers should patch test or request unscented alternatives from the brand.

45/ 100
♾️

PFAS

P&G has not disclosed whether fluorinated surfactants or processing aids are used in Secret Outlast manufacturing. Many mass-market stick deodorants use PFAS-containing emulsifiers; absence of confirmation is not absence of risk. Third-party testing is recommended before purchase if PFAS exposure is a concern.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Talc contamination (if present)

Secret Outlast ingredient label does not list talc; starch is the declared absorbent. No recalls or documented talc contamination in this product line on record. Risk is classified as none known for this specific formulation.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Secret Outlast is a stick composite of wax (likely paraffin or synthetic wax), starch (corn or tapioca for absorption), fragrance compounds, and aluminum salts as the antiperspirant active. The 'Invisible Solid' formulation emphasizes low residue on skin and clothing. Wax and starch are generally low-toxicity excipients, but fragrance blends in cosmetics remain poorly disclosed and can trigger contact sensitization in vulnerable users.

The brand's record and disclosure

Procter & Gamble (Secret's parent) has not published comprehensive PFAS content or sourcing data for this product line as of public record. The brand holds no third-party sustainability certifications (e.g., EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny) specific to chemical transparency. P&G faces no major recalls tied to Secret deodorants, but the parent company's opacity on PFAS "forever chemicals" in cosmetic emulsifiers remains a documented gap versus competitors like native or Kopari.

How it compares in its category

Secret Outlast sits in the mainstream antiperspirant segment; aluminum zirconium and aluminum chlorohydrate concentrations are standard for this tier. Fragrance load is moderate to heavy, typical of mass-market sticks. Compared to fragrance-free or hypoallergenic alternatives (e.g., Vanicream, Aluminum-Free Crystal), Secret offers stronger scent masking and longer wear but carries higher sensitizer risk and unresolved PFAS disclosure. Compared to premium natural brands, it offers no certified organic or plant-derived claims.

If you buy it

Apply to clean, dry skin once daily (usually evening for overnight protection); avoid application to broken skin or immediately after shaving, which increases aluminum absorption. Store in cool, dry conditions away from direct heat to prevent wax separation or fragrance volatilization. Discontinue use if rash, itching, or persistent underarm irritation develops; consider a fragrance-free alternative. Replace every 6-12 months depending on frequency. Request PFAS testing data from P&G before repurchase if uncertain about fluorinated surfactants in emulsifier blends.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Secret has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.