PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall63/ 100Good
Arran Sense of Scotland Natural Deodorant 60g

Sense of Scents · Deodorant

Arran Sense of Scotland Natural Deodorant 60g

Excellent

Lower concern, natural deodorant formula unlikely to contain PFAS.

Verdict: BuyNatural mineral deodorant with low PFAS risk and no established safety recalls; talc/mica base carries routine contamination concern but product transparency is adequate.

Arran Sense of Scotland uses mineral powders, plant waxes, and talc typical of natural cosmetics without waterproofing or grease-resistant needs. The formula itself presents minimal risk despite lack of lab data.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Natural mineral powders, plant-based waxes, talc or mica

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
🪨

Heavy metals

If formulation uses talc rather than mica, trace asbestos or heavy metal contamination from ore sources is a documented risk in talc supply chains, though modern cosmetic-grade talc is typically screened. Arran does not publish talc source verification or testing results on record.

Source: FDA
70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Essential oils and natural fragrance compounds can trigger contact dermatitis or sensitization in vulnerable users. Common culprits in Scottish natural cosmetics include lavender, geranium, and citrus oils. Individual sensitivity varies widely and is not a manufacturing defect.

70/ 100
⚠️

Rancidity and microbial growth

Plant-wax and oil-based formulas lacking synthetic preservatives are more prone to oxidative degradation and bacterial colonization if stored improperly or kept beyond 12-18 months. High humidity or heat accelerates spoilage.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Natural plant-wax and essential-oil formulations do not require synthetic preservatives (methylisothiazolinone, methylchloroisothiazolinone) or formaldehyde donors. No evidence this product uses them.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

Stick deodorant packaging (plastic tube or tin) is unlikely to leach BPA into the dry powder formula, as contact is minimal and no moisture accelerates migration. No specific evidence of problematic packaging for this product.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Arran Sense of Scotland uses a base of natural mineral powders (talc or mica, formulation varies by batch), plant-based waxes, and essential oils rather than synthetic antiperspirants or chemical preservatives. Talc and mica both absorb moisture through physical action rather than blocking sweat glands, making them lower-risk alternatives to aluminum compounds. The plant wax binder system avoids phthalates and most synthetic plasticizers common in conventional stick deodorants. No synthetic fragrance or chemical preservatives means lower risk of formaldehyde releasers or 1,4-dioxane contamination.

The brand's record and disclosure

Sense of Scents (Scottish-based natural personal care company) does not publish detailed ingredient sourcing or third-party safety certifications on publicly available records. The product is marketed as natural and talc-free or mica-based depending on variant, but the brand has not issued formal statements about heavy metal testing, talc sourcing purity, or contaminant screening protocols. No major recalls or documented safety incidents are on record for this brand in the deodorant category. The silent PFAS stance is consistent with small natural cosmetics brands that do not routinely test for PFAS.

How it compares in its category

Natural mineral deodorants like this sit at the lower end of chemical risk versus conventional aluminum antiperspirants (which carry dermal aluminum absorption concern) and synthetic deodorants with high fragrance complexity. Among natural stick deodorants, plant-wax-based formulas are more stable and less prone to rancidity than some all-oil competitors. This product avoids the microplastic risk of spray or aerosol deodorants and the preservative burden of water-based gel formulas. Compared to baking-soda-heavy naturals, it likely causes less skin irritation due to lower alkalinity.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place to prevent wax separation or discoloration from heat or direct sunlight. Apply to clean, dry skin; dampness can reduce efficacy and promote bacterial growth on the stick surface. Replace every 3-6 months depending on daily use frequency and climate; natural wax blends do not harden indefinitely and may oxidize or develop slight rancid odor over time. Inspect the stick for visible mold or discoloration; if present, discard. Do not apply to broken or irritated skin.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Sense of Scents has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.