PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall63/ 100Good
Hinoki & Sage Natural Deodorant

Sense of Scents · Deodorant

Hinoki & Sage Natural Deodorant

Excellent

Lower concern, natural formula unlikely to require PFAS but check ingredients.

Verdict: BuyNatural deodorant formula with no established safety concerns; brand transparency is limited but product category carries minimal chemical risk.

Natural deodorants rarely require PFAS-based coatings or water-resistant treatments. Sense of Scents provides no PFAS disclosure, so verify the full ingredient list for hidden fluorinated compounds.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Natural deodorant base (presumed mineral, plant oil, or powder)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Baking soda (sodium bicarbonate) skin irritation

A common ingredient in natural deodorants, baking soda can cause irritation, redness, or dermatitis in sensitive individuals or with prolonged contact, especially on broken skin. Not a hazard for most users but warrants a patch test before regular use.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens (hinoki, sage extracts)

Botanical fragrances, including cedar-derived hinoki and sage, are known contact allergens in a small subset of the population. No broad toxicity concern, but individuals with fragrance sensitivity or botanical allergies should avoid or patch test first.

70/ 100
⚠️

Rancidity in plant oil base

If the product contains coconut or other plant oils as a base, oxidation and microbial growth are possible if stored improperly or past shelf life, leading to irritation or mild dermatitis. Shelf life and storage conditions are not detailed on most available product pages.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No specific recalls or testing data for Sense of Scents products exist on record. Mineral-based deodorants (e.g., arrowroot, magnesium) can harbor trace heavy metals (lead, cadmium) depending on sourcing; brand does not publicly disclose third-party testing for contaminants in raw materials.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

Talc contamination risk (if talc-based alternative)

No evidence that Sense of Scents uses talc in this formula; natural deodorant marketing typically emphasizes talc-free status. However, if talc is present as a secondary ingredient, long-term inhalation risk applies; confirm ingredient list excludes talc if concerned.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Natural deodorants typically combine mineral bases (baking soda, arrowroot powder, or magnesium), plant oils (coconut or jojoba), and botanical extracts for fragrance and antimicrobial benefit. Hinoki and sage are plant-derived ingredients with no known dermal toxicity at cosmetic concentrations. The absence of synthetic antiperspirants, silicones, and talc in this category means reduced risk of skin irritation or inhalation hazards compared to conventional stick deodorants.

The brand's record and disclosure

Sense of Scents operates as a small natural personal care brand; no recalls, safety violations, or substantiated complaints appear in public records. The brand does not publish detailed ingredient sourcing or third-party certifications (e.g., EWG Verified, COSMOS Organic) on readily available materials. Limited transparency on manufacturing standards and supplier vetting makes independent assessment of heavy metal contamination in mineral bases difficult.

How it compares in its category

This product positions itself in the growing natural deodorant segment, which typically avoids aluminum chlorohydrate (the active antiperspirant in conventional products) and talc. Natural formulations carry lower acute toxicity risk than mainstream antiperspirants but may offer reduced efficacy and vary more in stability. Performance and irritation profiles depend heavily on individual skin pH and sensitivity; natural deodorants are not antimicrobial-efficacy regulated by the FDA like antiperspirants.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry location to prevent oil separation or powder caking, especially if in a cream or balm base. Patch test on inner arm for 24 hours before full application, as baking soda or plant oils can irritate sensitive skin. Discontinue use if rash, burning, or persistent redness develops within one week of first use. Replace if the product shows signs of mold, rancidity (off smell), or color change, which indicates spoilage.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Sense of Scents has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.