PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Humble Travel Sensitive Vegan Deodorant

Sense of Scents · Deodorant

Humble Travel Sensitive Vegan Deodorant

Excellent

Lower concern, deodorant paste format without water-repellency where PFAS appear.

Verdict: BuyVegan wax-mineral blend avoids synthetic fragrance allergens and talc risks; minimal hazard profile for deodorant category.

Humble's vegan deodorant contains no disclosed waterproofing or nonstick treatments where PFAS commonly hide. The mineral-based paste format carries minimal structural need for fluorochemicals despite absent brand verification.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

vegan wax blend, mineral-based absorbents

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Product is marketed as 'Sensitive,' implying fragrance is present but formulated for low-reactivity. If essential oils or fragrance compounds are undisclosed, risk of contact dermatitis exists, especially in individuals with fragrance sensitivities.

70/ 100
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral clays or wax sensitivity

Some individuals experience irritation from mineral clays or plant wax residue, particularly if skin barrier is compromised. Patch testing recommended before regular use, despite 'Sensitive' label.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

Talc contamination in mineral absorbents

Vegan mineral-based formula likely avoids talc entirely in favor of clay or magnesium oxide. No public record of talc-related contamination in this brand or product line.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Mineral absorbents (clay, magnesium oxide, silica) are generally inert and low-contamination risk. No testing or recall data suggests heavy metal presence in Humble Travel products.

Source: FDA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Vegan wax blends do not typically require formaldehyde-based preservatives. No indication this product uses synthetic antimicrobials with known release hazards.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Humble Travel Sensitive uses a vegan wax base (plant-derived) combined with mineral-based absorbents in place of aluminum salts or talc. Vegan wax blends typically consist of candelilla, carnauba, or coconut oil derivatives that are stable at body temperature and non-toxic by dermal exposure. Mineral absorbents (likely magnesium oxide, clay, or silica) are inert and have a long safety record in personal care. The formulation sidesteps two common deodorant hazards: aluminum compounds and talc powder.

The brand's record and disclosure

Sense of Scents maintains a silent stance on PFAS disclosure, which is common among small indie personal care brands lacking formal EWG certification or third-party testing announcements. The brand does not appear in major recall databases or regulatory warnings as of available public record. No established controversies regarding ingredient sourcing, labeling, or safety violations are documented. The 'Sensitive' and 'Vegan' claims suggest formulation care, though independent verification of these labels is not publicly available.

How it compares in its category

Most deodorants either use aluminum-based antiperspirants, talc fillers, or synthetic fragrance blends. Humble Travel Sensitive avoids the first two, placing it in a lower-risk subset of the category. Natural deodorants relying on plant wax and minerals typically have fewer endocrine-disruption concerns than synthetic antiperspirant formulations. The trade-off is that mineral-only deodorants may offer less sweat absorption than aluminum, though this is a performance, not a safety, issue.

If you buy it

Store below 25C to prevent wax separation or softening. Patch test on inner arm if you have sensitive skin, despite the 'Sensitive' label, since vegan wax blends and mineral clays can occasionally cause mild irritation in prone individuals. Replace when the stick becomes visibly crumbly or loses adhesion to the skin. No special cleanup or maintenance required; standard soap and water removal is sufficient.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Sense of Scents has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.