PFAS85/ 100Excellent
Overall63/ 100Good
Spalding Pack

Spalding · Golf Balls & Equipment

Spalding Pack

Excellent

Spalding backpacks likely lower PFAS risk, but no public disclosure available.

Verdict · BuyNylon/polyester backpack with no documented hazards; silent PFAS stance is limitation but material class poses low acute risk.

Spalding athletic backpacks use common synthetics like nylon and polyester. No PFAS claims or third-party testing data exist; synthetic backpacks may or may not include water-repellent coating coatings.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

nylon/polyester backpack fabric

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

VOC off-gassing from synthetic fabric manufacturing

Nylon and polyester production can leave trace volatile organic compounds (residual solvents, plasticizers) in the fabric. Off-gassing is typically heaviest in the first 48-72 hours and decreases with time and ventilation. No specific testing data for Spalding Pack exists in public records.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Polyester-blend fabrics often undergo finish treatments to enhance water resistance or dimensional stability. These may contain formaldehyde releasers. Spalding does not publicly commit to formaldehyde-free treatments. Skin contact is low risk for a backpack, but inhalation during storage in enclosed spaces is a minor concern.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Nylon and polyester shed microfibers during use and washing. For a backpack, direct human ingestion is not a pathway; the primary concern is environmental release. No product-specific data exists for Spalding Pack fiber shedding rates.

Source, EPA
70/ 100

Degradation of seams, zippers, and adhesives under UV and moisture

Mass-market backpacks, including Spalding models, commonly experience seam separation and zipper failure within 1-3 years of regular use. Degrading seam tape may contain urethane or other adhesives; no acute toxicity hazard, but replacement becomes necessary sooner than premium alternatives.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Spalding does not disclose dye or print chemistry. Some low-cost synthetic textiles use azo dyes that can release carcinogenic amines under specific degradation conditions. No recall or complaint data is available for Spalding backpacks; standard mass-market compliance usually meets US and EU dye safety baselines.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Spalding Pack uses nylon and polyester fabrics, both synthetic polymers widely used in sportswear and bags. Nylon is durable and resistant to abrasion; polyester adds water resistance and shape retention. Neither material typically leaches toxic chemicals under normal storage or use conditions, though both can off-gas volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during manufacturing. The main concern with blended synthetic textiles is their treatment during production, not the base polymers themselves.

The brand's record and disclosure

Spalding, a major sportswear and sporting goods brand (owned by Evenflo Juvenile), has no public record of pursuing formal chemical disclosure, third-party certifications (e.g., OEKO-TEX, BLUESIGN), or transparency initiatives for backpack materials. No recalls or documented hazard incidents specific to Spalding backpacks are on record. The brand's silence on PFAS and other chemical inputs reflects a broader pattern in mass-market sporting goods manufacturers rather than an acknowledged problem.

How it compares in its category

Spalding backpacks sit in the mid-market segment; they are cheaper and less heavily regulated than premium outdoor brands (e.g., Patagonia, Arc'teryx) but comparable to mass-market alternatives (Nike, Adidas bags). Brands with explicit OEKO-TEX or GOTS certification provide more assurance on dye and finish hazards; Spalding offers none of this transparency. For a basic nylon/polyester pack, Spalding presents similar PFAS concern levels as comparable unvetted competitors, but lacks documented commitment to reducing chemical hazards.

If you buy it

Air out the new pack in a well-ventilated space for 24-48 hours to reduce any residual manufacturing VOCs. Avoid prolonged storage in hot, enclosed spaces (e.g., car trunks or attics), which can accelerate off-gassing. Hand wash with mild detergent if cleaning is needed; machine washing is not recommended for most backpacks and may damage seams and coatings. Replace if fabric tears, seams split, or waterproof coating visibly degrades.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Spalding has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.