PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Star Brite Waterproofing

Star brite · Fabric Stain Guard Sprays

Star Brite Waterproofing

Poor

Skip until the brand discloses full composition details.

Verdict · SkipPFAS composition undisclosed and waterproofing treatments commonly rely on PFAS; brand silence on formulation prevents safety assessment.

Star Brite does not reveal the chemical makeup of this waterproofing product. Waterproofing treatments commonly use PFAS, so without transparency, you cannot assess the risk.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Waterproofing coating, composition unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Star Brite Waterproofing is made of, ingredients and materials

Star Brite Waterproofing's exact chemical composition is not publicly disclosed. Waterproofing coatings typically use either fluorinated compounds (PFAS-based) for durable water repellency, silicone, wax, or polyurethane systems. Without ingredient transparency, you cannot determine whether this product uses persistent fluorochemicals that accumulate in the environment and human tissue, or alternatives with lower concern for bioaccumulation. This opacity is the core safety issue.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

Vague safety claims only

Uses vague language ("eco-friendly", "clean") without a specific PFAS statement.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Waterproofing coatings historically rely on PFAS for durable hydrophobic performance. Star Brite has not disclosed composition; industry standard for products of this type and age makes PFAS presence probable.

Source, ATSDR ↗
20/ 100
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and solvent exposure

Waterproofing coatings commonly use solvents (aliphatic hydrocarbons, ketones, or esters) to achieve even coverage. No solvent content data is publicly available for this product; inhalation risk depends on formulation and ventilation during application.

70/ 100
🍳

Skin and eye irritation from coating solvents

Waterproofing products in this category routinely carry warnings for skin and eye contact. Star Brite's product labeling would specify irritancy; treat as likely based on product class unless label contradicts.

45/ 100
⏳

Coating degradation and reapplication frequency

Over time, waterproofing coatings break down and may shed microparticles or release volatile residues. Reapplication cycles create repeated exposure. Product longevity claims should be verified against actual field durability.

70/ 100
🏷️

Inadequate labeling and formulation transparency

Lack of disclosed full ingredient list prevents independent assessment of specific chemical hazards. This transparency gap is the primary safety concern and distinguishes this product unfavorably from competitors with open formulations.

45/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Star Brite is a marine and automotive care company with a long history, but public disclosure of full ingredient lists and PFAS content is not standard for their waterproofing line. No major recalls or safety controversies are on record for this specific product. However, the brand's silence on formulation despite industry-wide PFAS scrutiny suggests either use of conventional PFAS treatments or unwillingness to clarify alternatives with lower concern, both of which warrant caution.

How it compares in its category

Waterproofing products span a spectrum, budget brands often use older PFAS formulations; premium brands increasingly disclose PFAS-free or reduced-PFAS options (e.g., silicone or polyurethane bases). Star Brite Waterproofing sits in the mid-market marine segment where PFAS-based water repellency was standard for decades. Competing products with explicit PFAS-free claims and published safety data sheets offer better transparency for the same function.

If you buy it

Apply in well-ventilated outdoor settings or poorly ventilated areas away from breathing zones. Do not allow contact with skin or eyes during application. Wash hands and exposed skin thoroughly after use. Store in a cool, dry place away from children and pets. Replace or reapply according to manufacturer instructions, typically annually for high-wear surfaces. Dispose of empty containers per local hazardous waste guidelines.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Star brite has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Fabric Stain Guard Sprays

Nikwax Waterproofing Wax for Leather

Nikwax

Waterproofing Wax for Leather

65GoodPFAS grade
  • wax-based waterproofing
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Respiratory irritation or fume inhalation during application

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Angelus Mink Oil Paste Leather Waterproofer and Contitioner 3 oz

Angelus

Mink Oil Paste Leather Waterproofer and Contitioner 3 oz

65GoodPFAS grade
  • mink oil paste, natural oil-based conditioner
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Microbial growth (natural oil rancidity)

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Timberland Waximum Waxed Leather Protector

Timberland

Waximum Waxed Leather Protector

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Wax-based leather protector
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from solvents

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More fabric stain guard sprays grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.