PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall4/ 100Bad
Daily 50 Face Gel

Sunbum · Sunscreen

Daily 50 Face Gel

Poor

Skip waterproof gel sunscreens without PFAS confirmation from the brand.

Verdict: SkipWater-resistant gel sunscreen with likely PFAS in waterproofing; no major non-PFAS hazards identified, but brand silence on composition demands caution and label verification.

This water-resistant gel sunscreen likely contains ingredients to repel water and sweat, but Sun Bum won't disclose whether PFAS is in the formula. No testing data or PFAS-free certification exists.

The safe swap

Raw Elements Eco Formula SPF 30 Sunscreen

Raw Elements

Raw Elements Eco Formula SPF 30 Sunscreen

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

water-resistant gel base with UV filters

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Gel-based water-resistant sunscreens commonly use fluorinated compounds to achieve hydrophobic durability. Sunbum has not publicly confirmed PFAS-free status, and the gel format with water-resistance claim is consistent with PFAS-reliant formulas in the industry.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
⚠️

Organic UV filter photostability and skin absorption

If Daily 50 uses chemical absorbers (avobenzone, oxybenzone) rather than inorganic minerals, these can degrade under UV exposure and may be absorbed transdermally in small amounts. Most regulatory bodies consider typical sunscreen-level exposure low-risk, but some consumers prefer mineral-only alternatives to avoid this pathway entirely.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Many gel sunscreens, including beach-oriented brands, contain fragrance compounds to mask sunscreen odor. Daily 50's specific fragrance profile is not detailed in public materials, so undisclosed fragrance allergens (limonene, linalool, etc.) may affect sensitive individuals; this is not unique to this brand but worth checking the label.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Polymer coating residue and skin irritation

No reports of excessive irritation or residue buildup from Daily 50 have been publicly documented. Gel formulas can sometimes leave a sticky or filmy residue if not rinsed thoroughly, but this is a cosmetic preference rather than a safety hazard.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

If this product uses titanium dioxide or zinc oxide, regulatory-grade mineral sunscreen ingredients are screened for lead and cadmium contamination. No specific contamination reports for Sunbum products are on record, and FDA oversight of sunscreen raw materials is designed to limit this risk.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Daily 50 is a water-resistant gel-based sunscreen, meaning its staying power in water relies on hydrophobic (water-repelling) ingredients, which in gel formulas often include fluorinated compounds (PFAS) or silicone-based alternatives. Gel sunscreens typically contain UV filters (likely organic absorbers such as avobenzone or oxybenzone, or inorganic minerals like zinc oxide), humectants, and gelling agents. The water-resistant claim with gel texture is a red flag for PFAS presence without explicit brand confirmation otherwise.

The brand's record and disclosure

Sunbum is a mainstream beach and lifestyle brand with no publicly available comprehensive disclosure of PFAS use or commitment to PFAS-free formulations. The brand has not published independent ingredient testing results or third-party certifications (such as MADE SAFE or EWG VERIFY) for this product. Sunbum's silence on PFAS in water-resistant products is consistent with industry practice but represents a gap in transparency that leaves consumers unable to assess fluorine content.

How it compares in its category

Water-resistant gel sunscreens as a class carry higher PFAS risk than non-water-resistant creams or mineral-only sunscreens. Brands like Coppertone and Neutrogena offer similar SPF 50 products in comparable formats but also do not routinely disclose PFAS status. Mineral-only sunscreens (zinc oxide, titanium dioxide) or non-water-resistant gel alternatives eliminate the PFAS pathway but may sacrifice water resistance or cosmetic elegance that users prefer.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat to prevent any potential destabilization of UV filter components over time. Apply generously (about 1 ounce to full body) and reapply after water exposure or every two hours in continuous sun. Check the printed ingredient label for the specific UV filters used; if fluorine-containing compounds are listed or if the label simply states 'water-resistant polymers' without detail, consider this a marker of possible PFAS. For ongoing use, contact Sunbum directly requesting their PFAS testing and formulation statement to inform a renewal decision.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Sunbum has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Sunscreen

Goddess Garden Natural Sunscreen SPF 30 6 oz

Goddess Garden

Natural Sunscreen SPF 30 6 oz

mineral-based UV filters, plant-derived waxes

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation or photosensitivity from plant oils

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern mineral sunscreen backed by credible PFAS-exclusion certification.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Raw Elements Eco Formula SPF 30 Sunscreen

Raw Elements

Eco Formula SPF 30 Sunscreen

mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide, titanium dioxide)

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide in sunlight

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation or sensitivity to mineral film

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Mineral sunscreen backed by third-party verification, no fluorochemical history.

MADE SAFE certifiedEWG Verified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Raw Elements Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30

Raw Elements

Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30

mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide/titanium dioxide), tin packaging

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
🍳

Epoxy resin coating in tin lining

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Nano particle inhalation from loose powder form

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Mineral formula plus explicit PFAS-free stance and certs lower concern.

MADE SAFE CertifiedReef Safe Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More sunscreen grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.