PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
SET 01

· Deodorant

SET 01

Excellent

Lower concern, but the brand makes no public PFAS commitment.

Verdict · BuyTalc-free mineral powder deodorant with no established heavy-metal or formaldehyde concerns; PFAS score modest but not disqualifying for topical use.

This talc-free pressed powder contains mineral pigments without established PFAS risk. The brand offers no public PFAS policy or independent verification.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Pressed powder (talc-free, mineral pigments)

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What SET 01 is made of, ingredients and materials

SET 01 is a pressed powder deodorant formulated without talc, using mineral pigments instead. The talc-free claim eliminates the primary asbestos-contamination risk associated with talc-based powders. Mineral pigments (typically iron oxides, mica, titanium dioxide) are inert, insoluble compounds with low skin-penetration risk when applied topically to underarm skin. Pressed powder formulation means no volatilization or inhalation hazard from airborne particles during normal use.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed sensitizers

Product may contain fragrance; The brand does not disclose allergen-inducing scent components. Individuals with fragrance sensitivity should patch-test or request full ingredient list before full-body use.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial or fungal growth in pressed cake

Powder formulations can accumulate moisture and bacteria in humid bathroom environments if improperly stored or if skin is moist during application. Risk is use-dependent, not formulation-dependent.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

Talc contamination (asbestos risk)

Product explicitly formulated talc-free; asbestos risk does not apply to mineral-pigment base.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Iron oxides, mica, and titanium dioxide are standard cosmetic-grade minerals with no established lead, cadmium, or chromium risk at typical use levels; no recalls or test failures on record for deodorants.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Powder deodorants have minimal water content and do not require strong antimicrobial systems; The brand's ingredient list does not typically include formaldehyde donors, though full formulation not public.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

The brand is known for transparency on harmful ingredient exclusions (phthalates, parabens, mineral oil) but makes no public PFAS commitment or third-party certification claim for this product. The brand has not faced recalled deodorants for heavy-metal or formaldehyde contamination. No independent testing results for SET 01 specifically are publicly available; safety assessment relies on material-class standards and ingredient declarations.

How it compares in its category

Talc-free mineral-powder deodorants are a low-toxicity segment within cosmetics. SET 01 sits favorably vs. aerosol or aluminum-based antiperspirants (which carry dermal-absorption concerns) but offers no antimicrobial claim, so efficacy depends on mineral odor-control only. Compared to activated-charcoal or clay deodorants, mineral pigment formulas carry lower risk of skin irritation or heavy-metal leaching.

If you buy it

Apply to clean, dry underarm skin; powder deodorants require reapplication within 8-12 hours in humid conditions. Do not inhale directly during application. Replace if the pressed cake develops visible mold or odor changes (sign of bacterial growth in humid bathrooms). Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to prevent pigment degradation.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to SET 01?

Primally Pure Baking Soda Free Deodorant

Primally Pure

Baking Soda Free Deodorant

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • mineral-based powder blend (arrowroot, magnesium hydroxide, mica)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Skin irritation from magnesium hydroxide alkalinity
Each & Every The Mini Edit

Each & Every

The Mini Edit

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ EWG Verified
  • cosmetic formulations, primary ingredients listed
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Fragrance allergens (natural essential oils)

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

UNSCENTED SENSITIVE DEODORANT Primally Pure Skincare

Primally Pure

UNSCENTED SENSITIVE DEODORANT Primally Pure Skincare

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • natural mineral powders, plant-based actives, beeswax
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Beeswax purity and contamination

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More deodorant grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.