Zero Trace Natural Deodorant
Lower concern for powder formula, but brand silence limits full confidence.
This powder deodorant uses talc, mica, plant waxes and lacks water-repellent or nonstick treatments typical of PFAS. The brand remains silent on PFAS testing or claims.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
talc, mica, plant-based powders, natural waxes
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Zero Trace Natural Deodorant is made of, ingredients and materials
Zero Trace uses talc as its primary absorbent base, combined with mica (a mineral that adds slip and shine), plant-based waxes (likely beeswax or plant waxes for binding), and plant powders for color and scent. Talc itself is inert and widely used in cosmetics, but the critical issue is contamination risk, talc deposits can be mined near asbestos-containing rock, raising historical safety questions. The brand has not publicly disclosed talc sourcing or asbestos screening protocols, which limits independent verification of purity.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Talc and asbestos contamination
Talc mined near asbestos deposits can carry trace asbestos fibers. The brand has not publicly disclosed asbestos testing or talc sourcing standards, so independent verification of product purity is unavailable. The risk is lower for powder applied to skin vs. inhaled, but absence of certification is notable.
Fragrance allergens and undisclosed ingredients
Product contains plant-based scent compounds and essential oils, which are not individually itemized on packaging. Individuals with fragrance sensitivities or botanical allergies (especially to lavender or citrus oils, common in natural deodorants) may react; full ingredient transparency for essential oil blends is limited.
Skin irritation from mica or mineral irritants
Mica particles and plant powder can trigger itching, redness, or contact dermatitis in individuals with sensitive skin or mineral sensitivities. Incidence is low but not documented by the brand; patch testing is prudent before regular use.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
Heavy metals
No recalls or reported cases of lead, cadmium, or other heavy metal contamination in this product. Talc and mica are generally low-risk for heavy metals when mined from reputable sources, but the brand does not disclose testing results, limiting confidence.
Source, FDA ↗Formaldehyde / VOCs
Dry powder formulations require minimal preservatives; The brand's plant-based wax and powder blend does not typically require formaldehyde releasers. No formaldehyde has been reported in this product line.
Source, ATSDR ↗How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
The brand is a mainstream cosmetics brand acquired by Kose Corporation and has no major safety recalls on record for this product line. The brand markets products as cruelty-free and vegan-friendly but does not prominently disclose talc sourcing, asbestos testing, or heavy metal screening on packaging or website. This silence on talc-specific supply chain practices is typical for the deodorant category but represents a transparency gap compared to brands that explicitly verify mineral purity.
How it compares in its category
Talc-based dry powder deodorants are common and generally lower-risk than aluminum-containing antiperspirants or spray formulations that carry inhalation hazards. The brand's version is positioned in the premium natural segment and competes with brands like Kopari and Schmidt's, which similarly use talc or arrowroot as bases. Unlike some competitors, the brand does not advertise third-party testing for asbestos or heavy metals, placing it at the industry average for disclosure rather than ahead.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry place away from moisture to prevent clumping and mold growth in the container. Do not inhale the powder directly during application; tap it gently onto skin or use a brush applicator to minimize airborne particles. Replace every 12-18 months or if you notice discoloration, odor changes, or moisture accumulation. Patch-test on inner arm first if you have sensitive skin, as mica and plant powders can occasionally trigger irritation in individuals with fragrance or mineral sensitivities.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- has made a specific claim
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Zero Trace Natural Deodorant?
- mineral-based powder blend (arrowroot, magnesium hydroxide, mica)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Skin irritation from magnesium hydroxide alkalinity
- cosmetic formulations, primary ingredients listed
- A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
- Fragrance allergens (natural essential oils)
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- natural mineral powders, plant-based actives, beeswax
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Beeswax purity and contamination
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
More deodorant grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.