Tom's of Maine Antiperspirant Deodorant
No coating of concern recorded, and no PFAS statement from the brand.
The brand has published no PFAS statement for this product that we could find.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
mineral-based active ingredients, plant-derived botanicals, no synthetic water-repellent coatings
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Tom's of Maine Antiperspirant Deodorant is made of, ingredients and materials
Tom's of Maine Antiperspirant uses mineral-based active ingredients (primarily aluminum compounds) combined with plant-derived botanicals and natural waxes rather than synthetic polymers or water-repellent coatings. The formula contains no Teflon-type coating, silicones, or synthetic binders that carry thermal decomposition or leaching risks. Aluminum salts in antiperspirants are a different chemical class from aluminum metal leaching concerns in cookware; they are applied topically in low concentrations and do not involve heated surfaces or degrading ceramic coatings.
What’s concerning
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
Fragrance allergens
Tom's of Maine formulations typically use essential oils and plant extracts rather than synthetic fragrance compounds, reducing but not eliminating potential for contact sensitization. Specific allergen prevalence depends on the fragrance variant (lavender, unscented, or other botanicals) and individual skin sensitivity.
Aluminum salt systemic absorption
Topical aluminum salts in antiperspirants are absorbed in small amounts through intact skin; long-term systemic effects remain debated in scientific literature but no causal link to disease has been established by major health authorities. This is a category-wide concern, not specific to Tom's formulation.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
No formaldehyde-releasing preservatives have been recorded in Tom's of Maine deodorant formulations. The brand emphasizes natural preservative systems and does not list formaldehyde or releasers (such as DMDM hydantoin or imidazolidinyl urea) in available ingredient disclosures.
Source, ATSDR ↗Talc contamination
Tom's of Maine does not use talc in its antiperspirant line; mineral-based formulations typically rely on mineral powders (such as hectorite clay or mica) as absorbents, which carry no established asbestos risk profile.
Heavy metals
This product is not a cosmetic colorant and contains no intentional pigments. No lead, cadmium, or chromium contamination has been reported in mineral antiperspirant bases from this brand.
Source, FDA ↗How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Tom's of Maine has maintained a transparency-focused brand identity since its founding, with established certifications including Natural Products Association recognition and cruelty-free status. The brand does not issue a public PFAS statement, but no PFAS-containing coatings have been recorded in this product line. The company has faced no major recalls or safety controversies related to this deodorant category; its reputation rests on minimalist ingredient disclosure and avoidance of synthetic fragrance and colorant additives.
How it compares in its category
Mineral-based antiperspirants like Tom's sit at the natural end of the deodorant spectrum, avoiding polyethylene microbeads and synthetic polymer matrices used in conventional stick and roll-on products. Compared to aerosol antiperspirants, this solid form eliminates inhalation risk and propellant exposure. Mineral formulations typically have lower efficacy and duration than aluminum zirconium complexes in mass-market brands, a trade-off many consumers accept for reduced synthetic chemical exposure.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry location away from direct sunlight to prevent wax separation or base material degradation. The stick consistency is stable at room temperature and does not require refrigeration. Replace when the stick becomes depleted or shows visible discoloration or separation, typically after 2-3 months of regular use. Do not apply to broken or irritated skin; if irritation develops after application, discontinue use and rinse with water.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Tom's of Maine has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Tom's of Maine Antiperspirant Deodorant?
- mineral-based powder blend (arrowroot, magnesium hydroxide, mica)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Skin irritation from magnesium hydroxide alkalinity
- cosmetic formulations, primary ingredients listed
- A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
- Fragrance allergens (natural essential oils)
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- natural mineral powders, plant-based actives, beeswax
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Beeswax purity and contamination
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
More deodorant grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.