PFAS60/ 100Good
Overall48/ 100Poor
U by Kotex Security Lightdays Liners

U by Kotex · Period Care

U by Kotex Security Lightdays Liners

Good

Skip until brand confirms PFAS absence in adhesives and absorbents.

Verdict · SkipPFAS concern in adhesives unresolved by brand; no other established hazards on record, but disclosure gaps warrant caution.

U by Kotex provides no public PFAS disclosure for this liner. Period-care adhesives and absorbent materials sometimes contain PFAS; independent testing data is unavailable.

The better-graded swap

Aunt Flow Pads

Aunt Flow

Aunt Flow Pads

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nonwoven absorbent core, adhesive backing

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What U by Kotex Security Lightdays Liners is made of, ingredients and materials

U by Kotex Lightdays Liners use a nonwoven absorbent core (typically polypropylene or cellulose-based) with an adhesive backing for securing to underwear. Nonwoven materials are engineered fibers bonded together and do not shed microplastics under normal use. The adhesive formulation is the critical variable, water-based and hot-melt adhesives have different leachate profiles, and some adhesive systems have historically contained fluorochemicals (PFAS) to enhance water resistance in the backing layer.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

PFAS is graded separately (60/100 safety). Adhesive backing formulations in menstrual products are a known vector for PFAS; Kotex has not disclosed whether water-resistant adhesives in this liner contain fluorochemicals. Possible exposure during wear and disposal.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

U by Kotex Lightdays Liners are scented products (fragrance added to the nonwoven or adhesive layer). Fragrance compounds can trigger contact dermatitis or allergic sensitization, particularly in users with sensitive vulvar skin or known fragrance sensitivities. No ingredient disclosure of specific fragrance chemicals is publicly available.

70/ 100
⚠️

Adhesive skin contact irritation

Direct prolonged contact between the adhesive backing and skin can cause localized irritation, erythema, or dermatitis in susceptible individuals. Risk increases if adhesive remnants remain on skin after removal or if the backing loosens during wear, creating uneven pressure points.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Microplastic shedding from nonwoven core

Nonwoven polypropylene or cellulose fibers bonded in this liner do not degrade or fragment during normal wear or handling. No evidence of microplastic release into the body or environment under standard use conditions for this product type.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or reports of lead, cadmium, or other heavy metals in U by Kotex liners or their parent materials. Standard pulp and nonwoven production do not introduce heavy metals, and no evidence suggests contamination in this SKU.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Kotex (Kimberly-Clark) has not publicly disclosed the chemical composition of adhesives or absorbent treatments in U by Kotex liners, nor has the brand published certifications for PFAS absence. The brand maintains silent positioning on fluorochemical use despite industry-wide scrutiny of menstrual products for PFAS contamination. No recalls or safety warnings for this specific SKU are on record; however, absence of disclosure is not absence of hazard.

How it compares in its category

Menstrual liners span a spectrum of material choices, conventional nonwoven (U by Kotex, Kotex, Tampax), organic cotton liners (Seventh Generation, Cora), and reusable fabric options. Nonwoven-core products typically cost less and offer consistent absorbency but lack transparency around adhesive chemistry. Brands explicitly certifying PFAS-free formulations (Cora, Rael) or using certified organic materials provide higher disclosure, whereas Kotex's silent stance places this product in the mid-transparency tier.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to avoid adhesive degradation. Use within the printed expiration date, as adhesive performance and material integrity decline over time. Discontinue use immediately if you experience skin irritation, rash, or localized reactions; this may indicate sensitivity to the adhesive, fragrance, or residual processing chemicals. If PFAS disclosure becomes important to you, contact Kimberly-Clark directly to request confirmation of adhesive composition.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
U by Kotex has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to U by Kotex Security Lightdays Liners?

Natracare Organic Pads

Natracare

Organic Pads

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Fragrance allergens (if scented variant)

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Aunt Flow Pads

Aunt Flow

Aunt Flow Pads

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE certified✓ Organic certified
  • organic cotton with natural fibers
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Microplastics
Organyc 100% Certified Organic Cotton Tampons Cardboard Applicator

Organyc

100% Certified Organic Cotton Tampons Cardboard Applicator

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ GOTS (Global Organic Textile Standard)✓ MADE SAFE certified (for select products)
  • 100% organic cotton with cardboard applicator
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Cardboard applicator structural integrity over time

More period care grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.