PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall8/ 100Bad
Urban Decay Perversion Waterproof Mascara

Urban Decay · Waterproof Mascara

Urban Decay Perversion Waterproof Mascara

Poor

Waterproof cosmetics use unclear coatings; limited public data available.

Verdict: SkipWaterproof mascara with undisclosed polymer coatings and poor PFAS profile; use cautiously, avoid frequent eye contact, remove thoroughly nightly.

Urban Decay does not disclose PFAS presence or absence in this waterproof mascara. Waterproof cosmetics commonly contain Teflon-family coating or PFAS-based water-resistant agents, but brand transparency is absent here.

The safe swap

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Burt's Bees

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polymeric film-forming agents, waxes, unspecified waterproofing

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components

Urban Decay lists 'fragrance' in the INCI but does not itemize specific scent compounds; mascara is applied near sensitive eye tissue, and fragrance components (especially cinnamal, limonene, linalool) can trigger allergic contact dermatitis or eye irritation in susceptible individuals.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Waterproof mascara formulas commonly use formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (e.g., imidazolidinyl urea, dmdm hydantoin) to prevent microbial growth in wet emulsions; Urban Decay does not publicly confirm or exclude these agents, and eye-adjacent application increases inhalation and dermal exposure risk.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

Incomplete removal and polymer residue buildup

Waterproof mascaras are known to be difficult to remove completely; residual polymer on the lash line can irritate the eyelid margin and meibomian glands over weeks of use, potentially contributing to blepharitis or dry eye symptoms if hygiene is poor.

45/ 100
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from film-forming resins

Synthetic polymers and some wax solvents can off-gas low levels of VOCs during application or storage in warm conditions; exposure is brief and dermal/ocular rather than respiratory, but in poorly ventilated spaces (e.g., bathroom without exhaust) minor inhalation is possible.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or test reports of lead, cadmium, or iron oxide contamination in Perversion Mascara are on public record. Urban Decay sources from regulated cosmetics manufacturers in the US and EU, where pigment testing is routine, but full metal testing data is not disclosed.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Urban Decay Perversion uses film-forming polymers and waxes to create a waterproof barrier on lashes; the specific polymer identity and waterproofing agent(s) are not publicly disclosed by the brand. Waterproof mascaras typically rely on synthetic resins or silicone-based polymers to resist water, and the exact chemistry affects how easily the product can be removed and whether volatile organic compounds (VOCs) off-gas during application. The lack of transparency on waterproofing chemistry is common in this product class but limits independent safety assessment.

The brand's record and disclosure

Urban Decay has not publicly disclosed detailed ingredient sourcing, manufacturing safety data, or specific polymer identities for Perversion Mascara. The brand does not appear to hold third-party certifications (such as EWG Verified or Leaping Bunny) that would indicate extra scrutiny of formulation safety. No major safety recalls or contamination incidents are on record for this specific mascara, though Urban Decay's parent company (Estee Lauder) has faced isolated quality disputes in other product lines.

How it compares in its category

Most waterproof mascaras rely on proprietary polymer and wax blends; Perversion is typical in this respect. Brands with higher transparency (e.g., Sephora Collection, some indie brands) publish more complete ingredient lists or INCI declarations. Waterproof mascaras as a category carry inherently higher PFAS contamination risk than non-waterproof formulas due to water-repellent coating technology, making Perversion's poor PFAS grade consistent with sector norms rather than a brand outlier.

If you buy it

Remove thoroughly every night with micellar water or oil cleanser to minimize residue buildup on the lash line and reduce eye irritation risk. Avoid touching the eye area immediately after application to limit transfer of undried polymer to the conjunctiva. If you experience redness, itching, or irritation, discontinue and switch to a non-waterproof alternative. Replace the mascara every 3 months to avoid bacterial colonization of the wet formula in the tube.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Urban Decay has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Mascara

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Burt's Bees

100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Wax, pigments, natural oils (typical mascara base)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade67Good
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed sensitizers

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial growth and contamination in wax formula

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; conventional non-waterproof formula with no identified PFAS drivers.

Risky category by default

More waterproof mascara grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.