PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall22/ 100Bad
Wet n Wild MegaWear Waterproof Mascara, Very Black, 0.21 fl oz, Size: 0.24 Fl Oz

Wet n Wild · Waterproof Mascara

Wet n Wild MegaWear Waterproof Mascara, Very Black, 0.21 fl oz, Size: 0.24 Fl Oz

Poor

Waterproof cosmetic formula, PFAS risk unclear due to no ingredient disclosure.

Verdict: SkipWaterproof mascara with undisclosed PFAS risk; no major safety recalls on record, but lacks transparency on waterproofing agents and potential contaminants.

Waterproof mascaras often use fluorinated polymers to repel water, but Wet n Wild does not disclose ingredients or PFAS status. Limited public data makes assessment difficult.

The safe swap

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Burt's Bees

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

liquid mascara formula with waterproof polymers, unspecified coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (solvent contaminant)

Waterproof mascaras often contain surfactants and polymers that may carry trace 1,4-dioxane as a manufacturing byproduct. Wet n Wild does not disclose formulation details or byproduct testing, leaving this unconfirmed but consistent with the product category.

70/ 100
🏭

Bacterial contamination (due to product age or poor hygiene in manufacturing)

Waterproof mascaras are high-moisture products prone to microbial growth if manufacturing sanitation is inadequate or product sits on shelves for extended periods. Wet n Wild does not publish shelf-life testing or manufacturing audit reports.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🧠

Lead

Iron oxides and carbon black used in black mascaras are regulated by FDA, and no recalls or test results show contamination in Wet n Wild products. However, the brand does not publish third-party metal testing, so risk cannot be ruled out.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No recalls or published warnings for formaldehyde in Wet n Wild mascara; however, the brand's ingredient opacity means preservative systems are not independently verified.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed aroma compounds

Mascaras typically contain minimal fragrance, but Wet n Wild lists 'fragrance' as a catch-all term without breaking down specific allergens. Risk is low for this product category but unquantified.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Wet n Wild MegaWear is a liquid mascara with waterproof polymers and film-forming resins that create water resistance. The brand does not publicly disclose the complete ingredient list for waterproofing agents, which is standard practice in mass-market cosmetics but limits independent assessment. Waterproof mascaras typically rely on silicones, acrylates, or synthetic polymers; some legacy formulas used Teflon-type coating (Teflon), though this is uncommon in modern mascaras. The 'Very Black' pigment system likely uses iron oxides or carbon black, which are generally safe at cosmetic levels but depend on sourcing and purity controls.

The brand's record and disclosure

Wet n Wild (owned by Coty) has no published certifications (cruelty-free, vegan, or toxicology-based), and the brand does not voluntarily disclose waterproofing chemistry or test results for heavy metals or contaminants. The company has not faced major product safety recalls for mascara specifically, but this absence of recalls does not confirm safety testing. Wet n Wild products are not third-party tested by independent labs and ingredients are listed only to regulatory minimums, leaving PFAS and other additives opaque.

How it compares in its category

Mass-market waterproof mascaras (Maybelline, L'Oreal, NYX) share similar transparency gaps and PFAS risk profiles. Premium brands (Clinique, MAC) offer slightly better ingredient disclosure but at higher cost; many indie and clean-beauty mascaras explicitly avoid PFAS and synthetic polymers in favor of waxes and plant-based film formers. Wet n Wild's price point (budget-friendly) correlates with lower disclosure standards across the industry, not unique misconduct by this brand.

If you buy it

Replace every 3 months to avoid bacterial buildup in the tube and degradation of the waterproof film. Do not heat the mascara bottle or expose it to sustained temperatures above 77°F, as waterproof polymers can separate or break down. Remove with dedicated makeup remover or oil; avoid excessive rubbing, which can degrade the lens-coating on contact lenses if worn. If you experience irritation, redness, or eye infections, discontinue and consult a dermatologist, as formulation contaminants or poor manufacture hygiene can trigger reactions.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Wet n Wild has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Mascara

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Burt's Bees

100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Wax, pigments, natural oils (typical mascara base)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade67Good
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed sensitizers

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial growth and contamination in wax formula

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; conventional non-waterproof formula with no identified PFAS drivers.

Risky category by default

More waterproof mascara grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.