PFAS85/ 100Excellent
Overall59/ 100Good
Wilson Golf Men's Grip Plus Glove

Wilson · Golf Balls & Equipment

Wilson Golf Men's Grip Plus Glove

Excellent

Golf glove with synthetic grip. No known PFAS risk signals.

Verdict · SkipSynthetic golf glove with no established hazard signals; standard category risk profile and routine care practices mitigate textile concerns.

Wilson Grip Plus Glove uses synthetic microfiber or synthetic leather, materials not typically associated with PFAS. No water-repellent or stain-resistant claims suggest lower concern.

The better-graded swap

Wilson Duo Soft Golf Balls

Wilson

Wilson Duo Soft Golf Balls

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic leather or synthetic microfiber grip

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Synthetic microfiber and polyurethane-coated textiles can release microfibers during washing and wear. Shedding from golf gloves is expected to be minimal due to tight weave and localized hand contact; environmental impact is low compared to garments with broader skin contact.

70/ 100

Adhesive and coating degradation

Synthetic leather coating and grip adhesives can degrade from repeated flexing, sweat exposure, and UV light, potentially releasing volatile organic compounds or adhesive residues. Degradation is visible (loss of grip texture, peeling) and triggers replacement; no acute toxicity risk documented for Wilson products.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Synthetic leather and microfiber coatings may contain formaldehyde-based adhesives or cross-linkers during manufacturing. No recalls or test failures specific to Wilson golf gloves on record; limited skin contact duration (hand use only) and no direct mouth/face contact further reduce exposure risk.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Synthetic microfiber and polyurethane can be dyed using azo compounds or contain heavy metal salts (cadmium, lead) in pigments. Wilson does not disclose dye chemistry; no public violation records exist for this product line, and dermal exposure is limited to hands.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

Skin sensitization from finishes or dyes

Individuals with sensitive skin or dye allergies could theoretically react to residual finishes or dyes, particularly during sweating. No specific allergic reaction reports tied to Wilson Grip Plus gloves exist in public databases; dermatological risk is typical for all synthetic apparel.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Wilson Grip Plus gloves use synthetic microfiber and synthetic leather (likely polyurethane or PU-coated polyester) for the palm and grip zones, chosen for durability, moisture management, and tactile feedback during play. Synthetic leather avoids the animal welfare concerns of genuine leather but introduces polymer chemistry, the primary risk lies in finishes, adhesives, and dyes applied during manufacturing rather than the base material itself. Microfiber textiles are tightly woven nylon or polyester that shed minimally compared to loosely knit fabrics, reducing microplastic release during wear and washing.

The brand's record and disclosure

Wilson (owned by Amer Sports) publishes limited chemical transparency for apparel but maintains ISO 9001 manufacturing standards and does not appear on public lists of brands with significant textile chemical violations or recalls. The brand has not made explicit commitments to the Restricted Substances List (ZDHC Gateway) or similar chemical management frameworks that would distinguish it as a leader in textile safety disclosure. No established controversies regarding formaldehyde, azo dyes, or heavy metals in Wilson sports gloves are on record in public databases or third-party audits.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves occupy a low-wear-intensity segment compared to apparel (socks, underwear) that contacts skin for extended periods; exposure time and surface contact are limited to hands during play. Synthetic microfiber gloves generally pose lower dust and shedding risks than leather or natural textile gloves. Wilson Grip Plus sits in the mainstream consumer segment without specialty eco-certifications (like Oeko-Tex or GOTS); comparable offerings from Titleist, Callaway, and FootJoy follow similar material and disclosure practices.

If you buy it

Wash gloves in cool water with mild detergent after regular use to minimize sweat-salt accumulation and potential skin irritation; avoid hot water or prolonged soaking, which can degrade synthetic leather coating and adhesives. Store in a dry place away from direct heat or sunlight to prevent material embrittlement and accelerated wear. Replace gloves when grip texture degrades or synthetic coating develops cracks, as this signals loss of water-repellency and potential increased microfiber shedding. Normal washing and outdoor storage pose no known heating or chemical release risks.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Wilson has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.