All 83 running shoes we scored fail our PFAS screen
All 83 running shoes PFAS Authority has graded score below its 70 point pass mark for PFAS and other toxins, as of October 2026.
Every grade below is built from published materials, ingredient lists, certifications and brand disclosures, scored on one public rubric and ranked best-graded first. Each score links to the full breakdown of what earned it, and the numbers across the whole dataset are published too.
Are running shoes non-toxic?
None of the 83 running shoes we graded clear our screen. Non-toxic is not a defined or regulated term, so what we can tell you is what our graders recorded. Beyond PFAS, the hazards found or left unruled-out on running shoes in this category are microplastics, VOCs and off-gassing, artificial dyes, formaldehyde, heavy metals.
Why Converse Chuck Taylor All Star Cx Exp2 4.5 Men grades highest here, and why that is not a pass
Every grade on this page is one sum. A category starts from a baseline, each disclosed material or coating adds risk points, and each thing the brand or a third party has published takes them away. Below is that sum for the winner, then for 1 product it beats, so you can see exactly where the 45 points between the top and the bottom of this running shoes ranking come from. Nothing in this category reaches our 70 point pass mark, so this is the shape of the field rather than a recommendation.
Top graded, and still below our pass mark
Made of Canvas upper, rubber sole.
- +30Category baseline. The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
- +15No PFAS disclosure. No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
- -10Base material not linked to PFAS. The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
35risk points in total, which is a grade of 65
What the grade does not fix. It still carries one risk factor, No PFAS disclosure, and our graders recorded 2 other hazards on it. See the full breakdown.
What it still grades above, and why
What puts it behind. Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment, +35 points. Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS. The top-graded product carries no such factor.
Made of textile upper with GTX (Teflon-type coating-based) waterproof membrane.
- +35Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
- +30Category baseline
- +15No PFAS disclosure
80risk points, a grade of 20
No product on this page was physically tested by us. Every number above comes from published materials, ingredient and coating disclosures, certifications and brand statements, scored on one public rubric. Formulations change without notice, so check the current product listing before buying.
What to watch for in running shoes
Beyond the PFAS grade, these are the things our graders recorded on the 83 running shoes in this category. We assess from materials, brand statements and published research. We do not lab-test.
- Microplastics
Plastic fragments small enough to shed from a product into food, water or air without anyone seeing it.
Found on 12 of these running shoes. Plausible but unconfirmed on 24 more, meaning nobody has ruled it out. EPA
- VOCs and off-gassing
Volatile compounds that evaporate out of a material at room temperature, which is what a new product smell is.
Found on 3 of these running shoes. Plausible but unconfirmed on 27 more, meaning nobody has ruled it out. EPA
- Artificial dyes
Synthetic colours added to food, cosmetics and textiles, most of them petroleum derived.
Plausible but unconfirmed on 49 more, meaning nobody has ruled it out. FDA
- Formaldehyde
A preservative and resin ingredient that is also released slowly by a group of chemicals used in its place.
Plausible but unconfirmed on 45 more, meaning nobody has ruled it out. NCI
- Heavy metals
Metals such as antimony, nickel and chromium migrating from a material into what touches it.
Plausible but unconfirmed on 33 more, meaning nobody has ruled it out. ATSDR
The safest running shoes we graded, lowest PFAS risk first
Nothing in this category clears our buy threshold yet. That is the finding, not a gap.
See PFAS-free running shoes on AmazonThe running shoes we would skip
Lowest scoring in this category, worst first, with the reason.
- 20Saucony Men's Saucony Peregrine 16 GTXBad
Formaldehyde / VOCs
- 20Brooks Men's Cascadia 20 GTXBad
Teflon-family coating (Teflon-type coating/Gore-Tex) membrane degradation
- 20New Balance Men's DynaSoft Nitrel v6 Gore TexBad
Azo dyes in textile colorants
What we check on running shoes
- Confirmed PFAS, PTFE or fluoropolymer content, which is the heaviest penalty we apply.
- Stain, water or grease resistant treatments, which usually mean fluorinated chemistry.
- Whether the brand discloses what is in the product, or stays silent behind a “clean” claim.
- Independent lab results and certifications where they exist.
Full point-by-point rubric on the methodology page.
The running shoes brands we found no PFAS statement from
We found no PFAS statement from 13 of the brands here. That is our research, not proof a brand has never said anything, and it is not evidence of harm. It is why none of them score well on disclosure.
Asolo, Brooks, Converse, Diadora, HOKA, Inov-8, Li-Ning, Merrell, Mizuno, New Balance, Saucony, Skechers.
The brands that have published something, and what each of them actually said, are in our record of what every brand has said about PFAS.
Common questions about PFAS in running shoes
Are running shoes PFAS free?
All 83 running shoes PFAS Authority has graded score below its 70 point pass mark for PFAS and other toxins, as of October 2026. The lowest graded is Saucony Men's Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX at 20 out of 100.
Are running shoes non-toxic?
None of the 83 running shoes we graded clear our screen. Non-toxic is not a defined or regulated term, so what we can tell you is what our graders recorded. Beyond PFAS, the hazards found or left unruled-out on running shoes in this category are microplastics, VOCs and off-gassing, artificial dyes, formaldehyde, heavy metals.
Which running shoes should I avoid?
The three lowest scoring we hold are Saucony Men's Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX at 20, Brooks Men's Cascadia 20 GTX at 20, New Balance Men's DynaSoft Nitrel v6 Gore Tex at 20. The problem with the first is that gTX membrane likely contains PFOA/PFOS; consider non-waterproof alternative.
Which running shoes brands have not published a PFAS statement?
We found no PFAS statement from 13 of the brands we scored in this category, including Asolo, Brooks, Converse, Diadora, HOKA, Inov-8. That is what our research turned up, not proof a brand has never said anything, and a missing statement is not evidence of harm. It is the reason those brands cannot score well on disclosure.
Do you lab test running shoes?
No. We score from published ingredient lists, materials, certifications, disclosures and third party lab results where they exist. Where a product has been independently tested we use that result and say so.
More clothing and outdoor categories we have graded
Same rubric, same scale. These are the categories closest to running shoes.
- Best non-toxic outdoor furniture cushion protectants357 graded
- Best non-toxic tents323 graded
- Best non-toxic ski jackets217 graded
- Best non-toxic ski wax210 graded
- Best non-toxic yoga mats76 graded
- Best non-toxic rain jackets75 graded
- Best non-toxic fishing tackle57 graded
- Best non-toxic yoga leggings17 graded
Get the graded list, free.
The products we score each week, and the best-graded alternative in every category.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Does a particular brand of running shoes have PFAS?
Brands we grade across the catalogue
Everything we have scored from these brands, not just running shoes.
Want to filter the whole category yourself? Browse all 83 running shoes.