20Bad

Do Puma running & athletic shoes have PFAS?

The verdict
Puma running & athletic shoes average 20 out of 100 on PFAS Authority's PFAS and toxin screen across the 4 Puma running & athletic shoes graded as of October 2026, below the 37 out of 100 median for the 20 other running & athletic shoes brands graded alongside it.
Free to quote with attribution to PFAS Authority and a link to pfasauthority.com/brands/puma/athletic-shoes.

Puma running & athletic shoes average Bad on our four-band scale. None of them clear our buy threshold. That is above 18% of the running & athletic shoes brands we grade.

PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Puma says and does about PFAS

Puma says it used fluorinated chemicals (PFCs) for water-repellent finishes on apparel and footwear until 2017. Since 2021 it has used bluesign-certified Gore-Tex membranes and finishes, which it describes as either completely PFC-free or free from PFCs of environmental concern, so not necessarily free of all of them. Its 2025 annual report says its environmental policy has no standalone chemical phase-out commitment.

  • Brand statementPuma’s 2023 annual report says poly- and per-fluorinated chemicals (PFCs) were used until 2017 for water-repellent finishes on its apparel and footwear. PUMA Annual Report 2023 ↗
  • MaterialsThe same report says Puma started using bluesign-certified Gore-Tex membranes and finishes again in 2021, which are either completely PFC-free or free from PFCs of environmental concern. PUMA Annual Report 2023 ↗
  • Brand statementPuma’s 2025 annual report says its environmental policy does not currently include a standalone substitution or phase-out commitment. PUMA Annual Report 2025 ↗
  • MaterialsPuma markets its Rain and Stain Repellent shoe spray as a water-based, PFOA-free formula. PUMA ↗
  • Regulatory filingPuma is listed as a member of AFIRM, the Apparel and Footwear International RSL Management Group. AFIRM Group ↗

Sources checked September 14, 2026. A brand statement is the company’s own claim, which we report but have not verified. Our grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests.

Which Puma running & athletic shoes contain PFAS? Poor and Bad, we’d swap these

Puma Men's Velocity Nitro 4 GTX

Puma

Men's Velocity Nitro 4 GTX

20BadPFAS grade
  • textile upper with Gore-Tex waterproof membrane
  • PFAS. Gore-Tex relies on PFAS chemistry for water repellency. While the membrane is bonded and not directly…

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Gore-tex membrane with textile upper, unspecified water-repellent coating treatment
  • PFAS. Gore-tex waterproofing is documented to contain PFOA, PFOS, or other legacy/replacement PFAS. Puma's…

5 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Synthetic mesh/knit upper with water-repellent coating-treated waterproof coating
  • water-repellent coating degradation and potential leachates. Fluorinated water-repellent coating coatings…

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Puma Men's Fast-Trac NITRO 3 GTX

Puma

Men's Fast-Trac NITRO 3 GTX

20BadPFAS grade
  • Synthetic textile with GTX waterproof membrane
  • PFAS. Gore-Tex's hydrophobic layer and factory water-repellent coating finish on synthetics typically contain…

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

Better running & athletic shoes from other brands

Graded higher than the Puma average of 20.

  • Canvas upper, rubber sole
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes in canvas

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Converse Run Star Trainer

Converse

Run Star Trainer

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Canvas, rubber sole
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic dyes

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

New Balance

Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Mesh upper, Fresh Foam midsole, rubber outsole
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and color-based toxins

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

The same question, asked of the other running & athletic shoes brands

Best average grade first. Puma averages 20.

See every Puma product we grade on the Puma brand page, or the full running & athletic shoes ranking.