Do Columbia snow pants have PFAS?
Columbia snow pants average 20 out of 100 on PFAS Authority's PFAS and toxin screen across the 7 Columbia snow pants graded as of October 2026, and none of them reach its 70 point pass mark.
Columbia snow pants average Bad on our four-band scale. None of them clear our buy threshold.
PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Columbia says and does about PFAS
Columbia Sportswear Company says it completed a PFAS phase-out for all product types and brands at the end of 2024, and its September 2024 position statement described the transition and a possible different deadline for some severe-weather products. A 2022 NRDC, PIRG and Fashion FWD scorecard gave it an F and a petition campaign followed. We found no PFAS lawsuit against Columbia over its products.
- Brand statementColumbia's August 2025 Restricted Substances List says it completed its PFAS phase-out for all product types and brands as of the end of 2024. Columbia Sportswear Company ↗
- Brand statementColumbia's September 2024 position statement said it was moving to PFAS-free chemistry, and that some high-performance severe-weather products might follow a different deadline. Columbia Sportswear Company ↗
- Brand statementColumbia says it phased out long-chain PFAS including PFOA and PFOS many years ago and restricts them through its RSL. Columbia Sportswear Company ↗
- Regulatory filingColumbia's RSL tells suppliers about Minnesota's PFAS product reporting law, which requires manufacturers of products with intentionally added PFAS to report to the state. Columbia Sportswear Company ↗
- StudyIn 2022 NRDC and U.S. PIRG Education Fund delivered 48,000 petition signatures asking Columbia to phase out PFAS, and said it earned an F on their scorecard. The PFAS Project Lab, excerpting NRDC ↗
Sources checked September 29, 2026. A brand statement is the company’s own claim, which we report but have not verified. Our grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests.
Which Columbia snow pants contain PFAS? Poor and Bad, we’d swap these
- Nylon/polyester with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating
- PFAS, water-repellent coating finish composition is not disclosed. Standard fluorocarbon coatings used on…
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Nylon taffeta with water-repellent coating finish
- PFAS. Even if water-repellent coating is not fluorinated, some non-PFAS water-repellent finishes use…
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Nylon/polyester blend with water-repellent coating finish
- PFAS, 3L construction and Columbia's silent water-repellent coating stance make fluorinated finish probable.…
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- polyester with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish
- PFAS, water-repellent coating chemistry not disclosed by Columbia for this model; unknown whether legacy…
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Synthetic outer shell with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish
- water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating chemistry, undisclosed. Columbia does not publicly…
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Nylon/polyester blend with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish
- PFAS. Undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry on this product almost certainly contains fluorocarbon…
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Polyester shell with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish
- PFAS. Waterproof polyester apparel commonly uses PFAS-based durable water repellents. Columbia has not…
5 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonBetter snow pants from other brands
Graded higher than the Columbia average of 20.
- nylon blend with water-repellent coating water-repellent treatment
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- water-repellent coating chemistry (unspecified)
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Nylon blend with water-repellent coating treatment (likely fluorocarbon-based)
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- PFAS
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Polyester shell with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish; insulated lining
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment composition
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonSee every Columbia product we grade on the Columbia brand page, or the full snow pants ranking.