48Poor

Saalt Review, Is Saalt Non-Toxic?

PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.

Across 6 graded products, Saalt averages Poor (48/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. 3 of its products grade Good or better. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.

Worth buying from Saalt Good or better, safest first

Menstrual Cup Saalt

Saalt

Menstrual Cup Saalt

Medical-grade silicone

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade62Good
⚠️

Bacterial and fungal growth

Silicone surface can harbor microbes if not cleaned properly or stored in sealed, moist…

70
⚠️

Allergic reaction to silicone

True silicone allergy is rare but documented in medical literature; individuals with…

70

Lower PFAS concern since silicone menstrual cups aren't typical PFAS carriers, but Saalt doesn't disclose.

Risky category by default

Saalt Menstrual Cup Twin Pack

Saalt

Menstrual Cup Twin Pack

Medical-grade silicone (primary); no reported coatings

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade54Good

Silicone degradation over time

Medical-grade silicone is highly durable but is not permanent; discoloration, loss of…

70
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth from storage

If stored wet or in sealed non-breathable containers, menstrual cups can harbor bacteria…

70
⚠️

Allergic reaction to silicone or additives

True silicone allergy is extremely rare, but some individuals report irritation or…

70
⚠️

Vaginal irritation from improper fit or insertion

This is a biomechanical rather than chemical hazard; cups that are too firm, too large…

70

Lower PFAS concern since silicone cups aren't typical PFAS vectors, but brand discloses nothing.

Risky category by default

Package Free Shop Soft Menstrual Cup Duo Pack

Saalt

Package Free Shop Soft Menstrual Cup Duo Pack

Medical-grade silicone

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade58Good
⛏️

Heavy metals

Medical-grade silicone can contain trace amounts of platinum, tin, or other catalysts…

70
⚠️

Bacterial growth or biofilm if poorly maintained

Silicone texture can harbor bacteria if not cleaned thoroughly between insertions or if…

70
🏷️

Incomplete disclosure of coating lubricants or release agents

Menstrual cups may be coated or lubricated with silicone oils or waxes to ease insertion.…

70

Lower PFAS concern due to silicone, but brand transparency on PFAS is absent.

Risky category by default

Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these

Saalt Leakproof Comfort Brief

Saalt

Leakproof Comfort Brief

Organic cotton + polyurethane waterproof layer

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade17Bad

Polyurethane coating degradation and leaching

Polyurethane waterproof layers degrade over repeated washing and heat exposure. If the…

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from degraded coating

As polyurethane coating degrades over time and washing cycles, microscopic flakes may…

70

Skip until Saalt discloses waterproof coating or independent tests confirm PFAS-free.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Saalt Leakproof Seamless Brief

Saalt

Leakproof Seamless Brief

Nylon/polyester blend with leak-proof coating (composition unspecified)

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade0Bad
♾️

PFAS

Nylon-polyester blends with leak-proof coatings typically use PFAS or Teflon-type…

20
🎨

Azo dyes in nylon-polyester blend

Dark-colored period underwear often uses acid dyes (for nylon) and reactive dyes (for…

70
⚠️

Antimicrobial finish (silver, triclosan, or quaternary ammonium)

Some period underwear brands add antimicrobials to control odor. Saalt does not disclose…

70
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle shedding

Waterproof coatings on textiles can flake with age and washing. Period underwear users…

45

Skip until coating transparency improves; waterproof textiles frequently use PFAS.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Leakproof Cotton Brief Saalt

Saalt

Leakproof Cotton Brief Saalt

organic cotton with waterproof barrier layer (unspecified)

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade9Bad
⚠️

Waterproof barrier composition (unknown polymer type)

The unspecified waterproof layer could be polyurethane, polyester-blend, or…

70
🫧

Microplastics

If the barrier is primarily synthetic polymer (common for waterproofing), repeated…

70
⚠️

Adhesives or chemical treatments in seam construction

Seams and elastic waistbands may use synthetic adhesives or chemical bonding agents not…

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from barrier material or residual processing chemicals

Users with sensitive skin or chemical sensitivities have anecdotally reported itching or…

70

Higher uncertainty requires PFAS-free confirmation from brand before purchase.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →