Do Tupperware lunch boxes have PFAS?
Tupperware lunch boxes average 70 out of 100 on PFAS Authority's PFAS and toxin screen across the 4 Tupperware lunch boxes graded as of October 2026, level with the 70 out of 100 median for the 42 other lunch boxes brands graded alongside it.
Tupperware lunch boxes average Good on our four-band scale. 4 of the 4 we graded are worth buying. That is above 43% of the lunch boxes brands we grade.
PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Tupperware lunch boxes worth buying Good or better, best-graded first
- polypropylene plastic
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Microplastics. Repeated microwave heating, dishwasher stress, or contact with acidic/fatty foods may cause PP…
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- polypropylene (PP) plastic containers
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Migration from degraded polymer. Repeated heating, freezing, and dishwasher cycles can cause PP to become…
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- polypropylene plastic
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Microplastic shedding. Repeated use, abrasion, and UV exposure can cause microscopic plastic particles to…
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- plastic (polypropylene/polyethylene), stainless steel bottle
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Coating degradation and leaching from plastic container. Polypropylene degrades when exposed to high heat or…
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Better lunch boxes from other brands
Graded higher than the Tupperware average of 70.
Klean Kanteen
Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid
- Stainless steel body, silicone gasket lid seal
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Silicone gasket degradation
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- borosilicate glass
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Leaching from glass matrix or lid seals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- Stainless steel container, no surface treatment
- Lid/gasket polymer leaching
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
The same question, asked of the other lunch boxes brands
Best average grade first. Tupperware averages 70.
See every Tupperware product we grade on the Tupperware brand page, or the full lunch boxes ranking.