13Bad

USA Pan Review, Is USA Pan Non-Toxic?

PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.

Across 4 graded products, USA Pan averages Bad (13/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. None of its products grade Good or better yet. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.

Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these

USA Pan Cookie Sheet Pan

USA Pan

Cookie Sheet Pan

Carbon steel with unspecified nonstick coating

PFAS Grade15Bad
Overall Grade0Bad
🍂

Nonstick coating degradation and flaking

Imusa cookware, particularly in lower-price tiers, is documented anecdotally to show…

20
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume inhalation risk (if Teflon-type coating-based coating)

If the unspecified nonstick coating is Teflon-type coating, overheating above 500F can…

70
🍳

Coating bonding failure and rust exposure

If the nonstick coating delaminates completely, underlying carbon steel will rust if not…

70

Nonstick coating unspecified; PFAS status unclear without disclosure.

Nonstick, coating undisclosed

USA Pan Half Sheet Pan

USA Pan

Half Sheet Pan

carbon steel with nonstick coating, unspecified type

PFAS Grade15Bad
Overall Grade0Bad
♾️

Teflon-type coating nonstick fume risk (conditional)

If the coating is Teflon-type coating-based and heated above 500°F, degradation can…

70

Coating degradation and metal leaching

Carbon steel cookware nonstick coatings degrade over time with use and washing…

45
🏷️

PFAS

The absence of any public PFAS commitment or coating specification sheet from Imusa…

20

Nonstick type unlisted; no PFAS transparency from brand.

Nonstick, coating undisclosed

USA Pan Mini Sheet Pan

USA Pan

Mini Sheet Pan

Carbon steel with nonstick coating, composition unspecified

PFAS Grade15Bad
Overall Grade0Bad
💨

Nonstick coating degradation and fume release

Without disclosed coating chemistry, risk level cannot be quantified. If the coating…

70
🍂

Coating adhesion failure over time

User reviews on retail sites mention nonstick coating wearing or peeling within 1-2 years…

45
♾️

PFAS

Imusa's silence on coating type and PFAS status is the core safety gap. Older or budget…

70
⚠️

Lack of product safety documentation or certifications

Imusa provides no visible third-party testing (NSF, FDA migration studies) or safety…

70

Coating unconfirmed; PFAS risk cannot be determined.

Nonstick, coating undisclosed

USA Pan 3-piece Non-Stick Bakeware Set

USA Pan

3-piece Non-Stick Bakeware Set

PFAS Grade5Bad
Overall Grade0Bad
♾️

Teflon-type coating degradation and thermal off-gassing

Non-stick bakeware coatings can release fumes when heated above ~400-500°F, though baking…

70
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Hard-anodized aluminum is designed to prevent leaching, but the protective oxide layer…

70
🍂

Non-stick coating flaking or peeling into food

Consumer reviews mention occasional coating wear or flaking after extended use…

45
🏷️

PFAS

Most commercial non-stick cookware bakeware still uses Teflon-type coating-based…

20

Teflon (PTFE) coating

Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →