PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
USA Pan Half Sheet Pan

USA Pan · Bakeware

USA Pan Half Sheet Pan

Bad

Nonstick type unlisted; no PFAS transparency from brand.

Verdict: SkipCarbon steel with unknown nonstick coating and silent PFAS stance creates moderate uncertainty; safe if used correctly, but requires informed maintenance and heat discipline.

USA Pan makes this carbon steel sheet with nonstick coating, but won't say what the coating is or confirm PFAS status. That leaves buyers guessing.

The safe swap

Le Creuset Rectangular Cake Tin

Le Creuset

Le Creuset Rectangular Cake Tin

80/100 safety

80Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

carbon steel with nonstick coating, unspecified type

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating nonstick fume risk (conditional)

If the coating is Teflon-type coating-based and heated above 500°F, degradation can release polymer fumes linked to flu-like symptoms in humans and acute injury in pet birds. Brand does not confirm coating type, so risk cannot be ruled out; heating discipline is essential pending clarification.

70/ 100

Coating degradation and metal leaching

Carbon steel cookware nonstick coatings degrade over time with use and washing, particularly in dishwashers. Microscopic wear exposes underlying steel; while carbon steel itself is not toxic at culinary levels, flaking coating particles are undesirable. Imusa does not specify recoating options or expected lifespan.

45/ 100
🏷️

PFAS

The absence of any public PFAS commitment or coating specification sheet from Imusa, combined with industry-wide use of Teflon-type coating in affordable nonstick cookware, suggests likelihood that PFAS-containing coatings may be present. This is a transparency and informed-consent issue rather than an acute toxicity guarantee.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100

What’s reassuring

🧠

Lead

No recalls or public test results document heavy metal contamination in USA Pan carbon steel sheet pans. Imusa is a US-based company with decades of market presence; this hazard is not on record, but third-party lab testing is not published.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Aluminum leaching (if aluminum core present)

USA Pan sheet pans are specified as carbon steel, not aluminum composite, so aluminum leaching is not a material concern for this product. Risk applies only if construction differs from manufacturer claims.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

USA Pan half sheet pans are carbon steel with an applied nonstick coating whose specific chemistry Imusa does not disclose publicly. Carbon steel itself is inert and durable, but the nonstick layer is the critical unknown: if it is Teflon-type coating-based (Teflon), it poses fume risks above 500°F; if it is ceramic or silicone-based, the risk profile differs. Without brand transparency on coating type, consumers cannot make fully informed decisions about heat exposure or replacement timing.

The brand's record and disclosure

Imusa is a long-established cookware manufacturer with no public PFAS statements, certifications (such as GOTS or Cradle to Cradle), or third-party safety disclosures on their nonstick formulations. The brand does not list coating composition on packaging or websites reviewed in public sources. This silence is common among mid-market cookware makers but leaves consumers dependent on reverse-engineering or assumption about whether Teflon-type coating, ceramic, or proprietary alternatives are used.

How it compares in its category

Carbon steel sheet pans with nonstick coatings occupy a middle ground: more durable than traditional aluminum with nonstick, but less transparent than premium brands (Caraway, Our Place) that explicitly label coatings as PFOA-free ceramics. Bare carbon steel alternatives require seasoning but avoid coating degradation entirely. Stainless steel pans avoid coating risk but demand more oil and skill. USA Pan's price point and durability are competitive, but lack of disclosure puts it behind more forthcoming competitors.

If you buy it

Use only at moderate heat (under 400°F for roasting; avoid broiler use above 500°F until coating type is confirmed via Imusa support). Hand wash only; dishwasher use accelerates coating wear and increases leaching risk. Inspect the coating annually for chips, peeling, or discoloration; replace if damage appears. Contact Imusa directly to request coating material specifications before purchase or use if PFAS exposure is a primary concern.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
USA Pan has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Bakeware

Caraway Ceramic Baking Sheet

Caraway

Ceramic Baking Sheet

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent

Coating degradation and metal substrate exposure

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum substrate leaching (if aluminum core)

Limited concern

70
🍳

Thermal shock and coating fracturing

Limited concern

70

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

GreenLife Ceramic Nonstick Bakeware

GreenPan

GreenLife Ceramic Nonstick Bakeware

Ceramic nonstick coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
🔩

Coating degradation and aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microcracking and ceramic particle shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower risk, ceramic nonstick avoids Teflon-type coating and PFOA.

MADE SAFE (product-specific)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Staub 4-Piece Baking Dish Set

Staub

4-Piece Baking Dish Set

enameled cast iron

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade76Excellent

Enamel degradation and iron leaching

Limited concern

70
🍳

Thermal stress fracture of enamel

Moderate concern

45

Lower PFAS concern, enameled cast iron baking dishes without nonstick coating.

Risky category by default

More bakeware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.